COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS PATIENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4035Keywords:
Lumbar canal stenosis, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Radiological outcomes, Functional outcomes, Spinal stability, Nerve compressionAbstract
Objective: The lumbar spine, a crucial component of the musculoskeletal system, is integral for structural support and mobility. Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), characterized by spinal canal narrowing, is a growing concern associated with degenerative changes. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has emerged as a surgical intervention for LCS, aiming to achieve decompression and stabilization. This study comprehensively assesses the radiological and functional outcomes post-TLIF in LCS patients.
Methods: A cohort of 40 LCS patients undergoing TLIF at Indira Gandhi Medical College was studied. Fifteen were retrospectively assessed operated on before May 2016, and 25 were prospective, operated between May 2016 and May 2017. Demographic data, preoperative ASIA scores, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet joint arthropathy, and Bridwell Fusion Grades were analyzed. Statistical tests included mean calculations, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results: The study revealed a significant male predominance (57.5%) and age distribution (32 to 72 y) with a male-to-female ratio of 1.35:1 (p value 0.0049). Preoperative ASIA scores showed 50% ASIA grade D and 25% grade E. Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and facet joint arthropathy were present in 70% and 67.5% of patients, respectively. Bridwell Fusion Grade indicated 80% achieved grade 1 fusion.
Conclusion: This study contributes valuable insights into TLIF outcomes in LCS patients, emphasizing the significance of age, gender, neurological status, and associated pathologies. Favorable fusion outcomes suggest TLIF effectively stabilizes the lumbar spine. Future research with larger cohorts could further validate these findings and refine TLIF's role in LCS management.
Downloads
References
Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Chung SK. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):1095-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772, PMID 20308517.
Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J. 2013;13(7):734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059, PMID 23830297.
Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097, PMID 18287604.
Weiss MD, Wasdell MB, Bomben MM, Rea KJ, Freeman RD. Sleep hygiene and melatonin treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD and initial insomnia. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2006;45(5):512-9. doi: 10.1097/01.
Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(12):1441-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a, PMID 15959375.
Phan K, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;135:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.05.016, PMID 26051881.
Watters WC, Baisden J, Gilbert TJ, Kreiner S, Resnick DK, Bono CM. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2008;8(2):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.033, PMID 18082461.
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(14):1329-38. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d, PMID 20453723.
Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, Sivasubramanian P, Cahill K, Ziewacz J. Incidence of low back pain after lumbar discectomy for herniated disc and its effect on patient-reported outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):1988-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1, PMID 25694267.
Ong KL, Auerbach JD, Lau E, Schmier J, Ochoa JA. Economic burden of surgical site infections following lumbar surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Surg. 2014;57(3):E79-83.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05, PMID 27683674.
Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788, PMID 27074067.
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794-810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136, PMID 18287602.
Fay LY, Wu JC, Tsai TY. Intervertebral disc-related pus-occupying lesions: a potential complication of lumbar discectomy. Spine J. 2016;16(12):e789-94. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.067.
Anderson PA, McCormick PC, Angevine PD. Randomized controlled trials of the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 1983-2007. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(10):566-73. doi:
10.5435/00124635-200810000-00002, PMID 18832600.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 RAHUL KUMAR SINGH, CHHEWANG TOPGIA, PRIYANK DEEPAK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.