LIMBERG FLAP VERSUS BASCOM CLEFT LIFT TECHNIQUES FOR SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL SINUS

Authors

  • PIYUSH JAIN General and Laparoscopic Surgeon, Senior Consultant, Somani Hospital, Jaipur, India
  • BALRAM HARSANA General and Laparoscopic Surgeon, Senior Consultant, Nivik Hospital, Jaipur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i4.5009

Keywords:

Pilonidal sinus, Limberg flap, Bascom cleft lift, Surgical outcomes, Postoperative complications, Sacrococcygeal disease

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques, the limberg flap and Bascom cleft lift, used in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Key metrics for comparison include postoperative complications, hospital stay duration, and surgery duration.

Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at ESIC Hospital, Jaipur, involving 100 patients diagnosed with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus requiring surgical intervention. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I underwent the Bascom cleft lift procedure (n=40), and Group II underwent the limberg flap technique (n=60). Both groups were evaluated over a period of one and a half years with preoperative assessments and postoperative follow-ups for complications, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay.

Results: The study included 40 patients in the Bascom group (42.5% male, 57.5% female) and 60 in the limberg group (55% male, 45% female). The average surgery duration was significantly shorter for the Bascom procedure (36.73±6.52 min) compared to the limberg flap (74.58±10.10 min). Postoperative complications were higher in the limberg flap group. The Bascom cleft lift patients experienced shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative issues, including lower rates of discharge and infection.

Conclusion: The Bascom cleft lift procedure appears to be superior to the limberg flap in terms of shorter operative time, fewer complications, and quicker recovery. These findings suggest that the Bascom cleft lift could be a more efficient and safer option for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus, promoting faster patient recovery with fewer postoperative complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mayo H. Observations on injuries and diseases of the rectum. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1834;28:45-6. doi: 10.1097/00000441-183408000-00013.

Aithal SK, Rajan CS, Reddy N. Limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus a safe and sound procedure. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(4):298-301. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0489-5, PMID 24426457.

Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82(6):1169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00062-2, PMID 12516846.

Humphries AE, Duncan JE. Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(1):113-24. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.006, PMID 20109636.

Clothier PR, Haywood IR. The natural history of the post-anal (pilonidal) sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984;66(3):201-3. PMID 6721409.

McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub2, PMID 17943897.

Lee HC, Ho YH, Seow CF, Eu KW, Nyam D. Pilonidal disease in singapore: clinical features and management. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70(3):196-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01785.x, PMID 10765903.

Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery. 1980;87(5):567-72. PMID 7368107.

Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62(5):385-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1992.tb07208.x, PMID 1575660.

Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82(6):1169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00062-2, PMID 12516846.

Da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst: cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(8):1146-56. doi: 10.1007/BF02236564, PMID 10950015.

Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg. 2005;190(3):388-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.068, PMID 16105524.

Wolfe EM, Ainuz BY, Ragheb J, Wolfe SA. A simplified approach for surgical correction of vertical orbital dystopia: A 45 y retrospective cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010857, PMID 37337340.

Topgül K. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with rhomboid flap. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03350.x, PMID 19627408.

Bascom J, Bascom T. Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2007;193(5):606-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.008, PMID 17434365.

Abdelrazeq AS, Rahman M, Botterill ID, Alexander DJ. Short-term and long-term outcomes of the cleft lift procedure in the management of nonacute pilonidal disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(7):1100-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9262-z, PMID 18470564.

Bascom J, Bascom T. Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2007;193(5):606-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.008, PMID 17434365.

Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg. 2002;137(10):1146-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1146, PMID 12361421.

Mentes O, Bagci M, Bilgin T, Ozgul O, Ozdemir M. Limberg flap procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: results of 353 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(2):185-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0227-9, PMID 17899165.

Basavaraju SM, KS, Vaggara HB. Different surgical approaches for pilonidal sinus-our experience in a peripherally located Tertiary Care Hospital. J Med Sci Health. 2021;7(1):52-5. doi: 10.46347/jmsh.2021.v07i01.009.

Wadhawan DG, Sharma DD, Vyas DK. A comparative study of different treatment outcomes in cases of pilonidal disease. Int J Surg Sci. 2020;4(3):292-7. doi: 10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i3e.511.

Jeyalaksmi T, Priya ES. LimbergLimberg transposition flap in primary pilonidal sinus-a case series. J Clin Diagn Res. 2023;17(4):PR01-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63105.17759.

Published

15-07-2024

How to Cite

JAIN, P., and B. HARSANA. “LIMBERG FLAP VERSUS BASCOM CLEFT LIFT TECHNIQUES FOR SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL SINUS”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 16, no. 4, July 2024, pp. 55-58, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i4.5009.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)