POORLY DIFFERENTIATED CLUSTERS IN COLORECTAL CARCINOMA: ASSOCIATION WITH OTHER HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC PARAMETERS INCLUDING TUMOUR BUDDING

PRAGNYA PARAMITA MISHRA; RAKESH PANIGRAHI; SMRUTI RANJAN HOTA; VAISHALI NAGPAL

doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i6.5081

Authors

PRAGNYA PARAMITA MISHRA Department of Pathology, Hitech medical college, Rourkela, India
RAKESH PANIGRAHI Department of Paediatrics, Hitech medical college, Rourkela, India
SMRUTI RANJAN HOTA Department of General surgery, Hitech medical college, Rourkela, India
VAISHALI NAGPAL Department of Pathology, Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar medical college and Hospital, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i6.5081

Keywords:

Colorectal carcinoma, Outcome, Poorly differentiated clusters, Prognosis

Abstract

Objective: In India, colorectal carcinoma (CRC) ranks third in terms of cancer incidence. Pathologists are essential when it comes to determining the stage, examining surgical margins, and recording the histopathologic prognostic factors. A new prognostic grading system is proposed named poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs), which are defined by neoplastic clusters of 5 cells lacking glandular structure in the invasive front of the stroma. It is significant for cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival in CRC patients, reflecting the biological aggressiveness of the tumor. Aim of the study was to analyse of PDCs in colorectal carcinomas and association with other histopathological prognostic factors.

Methods: The Hematoxylin and Eosin (HandE)-stained slides of 76 histopathologically diagnosed CRC resection specimens were reviewed. Poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) were assessed into under 200x power. The correlation of PDC with other histopathological prognostic parameters like tumor size, site, grade, laterality, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, T stage, N stage, and tumor budding was analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test with SPSS version 26.0.

Results: There was no significant association between PDC and age, tumor location, tumor size, histological grade, LVI, PNI, or lymphnode status. Where a significant association was noted between the sex and PDC grade (P value = 0.035), T stage and PDC grade (P value = 0.045), and N stage and PDC grade is significant (P value = 0.001).

Conclusion: PDCs may be considered, along with other clinical-pathological parameters, a promising prognostic factor for the management of patients with CRC and should be included in pathological reports, but it still needs standardization and further validation. At the same time, tumor budding can become an irreplaceable histological indicator for identifying a high malignant potential carcinoma and poor prognosis in CRCS, thus indicating the need for aggressive postoperative management to improve the prognosis of the patient. PDC is important for the survival of CRC patients, indicating the aggressiveness of the tumor both in terms of cancer-specific survival and freedom from recurrence. PDC may help to identify patients who need a more intensive postoperative follow-up and the possibility of adjuvant therapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ewing I, Hurley JJ, Josephides E, Millar A. The molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(1):26-30. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100329, PMID 24416503.

Barresi V, Reggiani Bonetti L, Ieni A, Caruso RA, Tuccari G. Poorly differentiated clusters: clinical impact in colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.06.002, PMID 27444718.

Ueno H, Hase K, Hashiguchi Y, Shimazaki H, Tanaka M, Miyake O. Site specific tumor grading system in colorectal cancer: multicenter pathologic review of the value of quantifying poorly differentiated clusters. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Feb 1;38(2):197-204. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000113, PMID 24418853.

Bertoni L, Barresi V, Bonetti LR, Caramaschi S, Mangogna A, Lionti S. Poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) in colorectal cancer: does their localization in tumor matter? Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019 Aug 1;41:106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.06.008, PMID 31233902.

Ueno H, Kajiwara Y, Shimazaki H, Shinto E, Hashiguchi Y, Nakanishi K. New criteria for histologic grading of colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Feb 1;36(2):193-201. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318235edee, PMID 22251938.

Reggiani Bonetti L, Barresi V, Bettelli S, Domati F, Palmiere C. Poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) in colorectal cancer: what is and ought to be known. Diagn Pathol. 2016 Dec 1;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13000-016-0481-7, PMID 27004798.

Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishiguro M, Kajiwara Y, Sato T. Histological grading of colorectal cancer: a simple and objective method. Ann Surg. 2008 May 1;247(5):811-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318167580f, PMID 18438118.

Barresi V, Bonetti LR, Ieni A, Branca G, Baron L, Tuccari G. Histologic grading based on counting poorly differentiated clusters in preoperative biopsy predicts nodal involvement and pTNM stage in colorectal cancer patients. Hum Pathol. 2014 Feb 1;45(2):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.046, PMID 24289972.

Barresi V, Tuccari G. Colorectal carcinoma grading quantified by counting poorly differentiated clusters: is it feasible on endoscopic biopsies? Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Jun;37(6):943-5. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31828a69e7, PMID 23629448.