METHODOLOGY OF FEEDBACK SYSTEM IN EVALUATING THE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION 2ND-YEAR PHARMACOLOGY: CONCEPTS, IMPLEMENTATIONS, AND HURDLES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijms.2024.v12i3.50312Keywords:
Pharmacology, Feedback, Evaluation, Medical, EducationAbstract
The aim and objective of the study was to determine the teaching methods and their pros and cons that predominate in students in understanding and scoring in formative and summative assessments. Pharmacology is a course that needs extra care in this direction as this field is ever-changing. It is very difficult for a student to remember the classification of drugs, names, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, indications, contraindications, side effects, and adverse drug reactions. The present study focuses on the mental level and the economical aspects of the persons involved in the establishment of the medical college.
References
Rauf A, Shamim MS, Aly SM, Chundrigar T, Alam SN. Formative assessment in undergraduate medical education: Concept, implementation and hurdles. J Pak Med Assoc 2014;64:72-5.
Sabzwari SR, Bhanji S, Zuberi RW. Integration of geriatrics into a spiral undergraduate medical curriculum in Pakistan: Evaluation and feedback of third-year medical students. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2011;24:622.
Konda VC, Prakash GB, Subash KR, Rao KU. Second year medical students’ feedback on teaching-learning methodologies and evaluation methods in pharmacology: Aquestionnaire based study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2017;6:1311-6.
Shah NA, Saiyad S, Patel M. Student perceptions in regard to formative assessment in medical education. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2023;13:1484-7.
Veugen MJ, Gulikers JT, Den Brok P. We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice. Stud Educ Eval 2021;70:101027.
Andreassen P, Malling B. How are formative assessment methods used in the clinical setting? A qualitative study. Int J Med Educ 2019;10:208-15.
Rehan HS, Banerjee I, Suranagi UD, Goel N. Do pharmacology faculties welcome the new competency-based undergraduate curriculum? A nationwide questionnaire-based study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2020;10:450-4.
Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Comparing students’ attitudes in problem-based and conventional curricula. Acad Med 1996;71:1096-9.
Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Comparing achievement on the medical council of Canada qualifying examination part I of students in conventional and problem-based learning curricula. Acad Med 1998;73:1211-3.
Rushton A. Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Med Teach 2005;27:409-513.
Hattie JA. Identifying the salient facets of a model of student learning: A synthesis of meta analyses. Int J Educ Res 1987;11:187-212.
Sadler DR. Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assess Educ 1998;5:77-84.
James J. A multi‐faceted formative assessment approach: Better recognising the learning needs of students. Assess Eval High Educ 2010;35:565-76.
Archer J. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:101-8.
Lunn B. Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice (2nd edn). BJPsych Bull 2015;39:103. 16. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/information-desk/for-colleges/ ug-curriculum17. Subramaniam B, Hande S, Komettil R. Attendance and achievement in medicine: investigating the impact of attendance policies on academic performance of medical students. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2013;3:202-5.
Daud A, Bagria A, Shah K, Puryer J. Should undergraduate lectures be compulsory? The views of dental and medical students from a UK University. Dent J (Basel) 2017;5:15.
Li L, XV Q, Yan J. COVID-19: The need for continuous medical education and training. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:e23.
Shrivastava SB, Shrivastava PS. Attendance norms in undergraduate medical education in India: Issue worth considering. Curr Med Issues 2021;19:171-4.
Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Basic sciences in problem-based learning and conventional curricula: Students’ attitudes. Med Educ 1997;31:77-88.
Furlanut M. The teaching of pharmacology in Italian Medical schools: The point of view of Italian doctors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998;54:801-4.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Deepak Prashar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
