EVALUATION OF THE INDIAN TOP 10 PHARMA EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS RESEARCH OUTPUT LISTED BY NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL RANKING FRAMEWORK (NIRF) 2020: A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2021v13i7.41709Keywords:
Scientometric study, Research output, National institutional ranking framework, NIRF, Pharma education, SCOPUSAbstract
The Higher Education System Rankings measure national higher education systems and meet a long-standing need to shift the discussion from the ranking of the NIRF top institutions to the best overall systems in each country, to reflect the country’s overall performance in NIRF rankings we propose a new Excellence/Quality indicator based on the excellence level reached by their Top Pharma education institutions within the Top positions of the NIRF weighted by the country’s size population. In the present study, we analyzed the Top 10 Pharma education institutions of the NIRF Ranking 2020. The first rank positioned by Hamdard University NIRF score of (80.5). SCOPUS database was used to extract the data and the study was limited to five years (2016-2019) which resulted in 7172 documents. The data analysis was performed using Biblioshiny, Microsoft excel, and VOS Viewer software, further data were explored using the bibliometrics tools and techniques. The study attempt to measure the top 10 Pharma Education Institution’s and their publications, Year-Wise distribution of research Output, document type, Highly Prolific Authors, Most Preferred Sources, Funding Agencies, Most Cited Papers, Most Productive and Most Cited Countries, and Highly Prolific Keywords based on the collected data. The analysis of the study indicates the highest publications with 2129, published by Institute of Chemical Technology-Mumbai; the most the productive year 2017 with 1508 publications; most of the publications are published as articles (6067); highly prolific author Sekar N with 194 papers, total citation 1954, h-index 22; preferred source title RSC Advance, 217 paper, total citation 2508, h-index 24; top funding agency University Grant Commission (UGC) 609 papers; top cited paper Shao Y, 2015, Molecular Physics; most productive and most cited country the USA.
Downloads
References
Reddy KS, Xie E, Tang Q. Pacific science review b: humanities and social sciences rankings: a case of India and comparison with China. Pacific Sci Rev A Nat Sci Eng 2016;2:1–21.
Sangam SL, Bagalkoti VT. Rankings of Indian Universities: a scientometrics analysis. Proc 10th Int CALIBER; 2015. p. 182–91.
Prathap G. The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr Sci 2014;107:389–96.
NKS, Mathew KS, Cherukodan S. Impact of scholarly output on university ranking. Glob Knowledge Mem Commun 2018;67:154–65.
Vignesh M, Ganesh GNK. Current status, challenges and preventive strategies to overcome data integrity issues in the pharmaceutical industry. Int J Appl Pharm 2020;12:19–23.
Kumar A, Tiwari S, Chauhan AK, Ahirwar R. Impact of NIRF on research publications: a study on top 20 (ranked) Indian Universities. Collnet J Sci Inf Manag 2019;13:219-9.
Marisha, Banshal SK, Singh VK. Research performance of central universities in India. Curr Sci 2017;112:2198–207.
Mukherjee B. Ranking Indian universities through research and professional practices of national institutional ranking framework (NIRF): a case study of select central universities in India. J Indian Libr Assoc 2016;52:93–107.
Gourikeremath G, Hiremath RS. A comparative study of university of mysore and karnatak university in science. Res Output Citation Impact During 2002-16 2020;56:75–83.
Kappi M, Chaman Sab M MB, Bagalkoti DVT. Research productivity of NIRF 2020 top indian law institutions. In: Rai DP, Singh DA, Arjun D, Prasad S, Bansal DV. editors. Changing dimensions of education and librarianship during COVID-19. Bhagalpur: AKB Publication; 2020. p. 48–68.
Pradhan B, Ramesh DB. Scientometric analysis of research publications of six. Indian Institutes Technol 2018;65:50–6.
Das TK. Bibliometric analysis of research publications of IITs: a study based on scopus. J Acad Librariansh 2019;20:105–23.
Kumar, Satish, Senthilkumar R, Kumar S, Senthilkumar R. Scientometric mapping of research output of NIRF first ranked institute of India: IISc, Bangalore. Libr Philos Pract; 2019.
Lwoga ET, Sangeda RZ, Sife AS. Online visibility of pharmacy research in tanzania: a scientometric study. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;9:72.
Pal JK, Sarkar S. Evaluation of institutional research productivity. DESIDOC J Library Information Technol 2020;40:406–17.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017;11:959–75.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523–38.
Lawani SM. Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: a bibliometric study. [Internet]. Florida State University; 1980. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=7306719. [Last accessed on 01 Mar 2021].
Subramanyam K. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. J Inf Sci 1983;6:33–8.
Ajiferuke I, Burell Q, Tague J. Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics 2021;14:421–33.
Savanur K, Srikanth R. Modified collaborative coefficient: a new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics 2010;84:365–71.
Palsokar G, Tajne M. Postgraduate research in pharmaceutical sciences in India: a survey of select pharmacy professionals. Int J Curr Pharm Res 2017;9:161.