NIMESULIDE: DISSOLUTION PROFILE, VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CAPSULES, AND ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCT QUALITY

Authors

  • Beatriz Werneck Lopes Santos University of Brasilia
  • Eloisa Dutra Caldas University of Brasilia
  • MÔnica Valero Da Silva Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Brasilia, Darcy Ribeiro University Campus, 70910-900, Brasília, Brazil

Keywords:

Nimesulide, Dissolution profile, Validation, Capsules, Tablets, Compounding pharmacy

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this paper was to evaluate the quality of similar (S, n=3) and generic (G, n=3) tablets and compounding capsules (C, n=6) containing nimesulide (100 mg).

Methods: The parameters investigated (weight, nimesulide content, uniformity of dosage units, disintegration, friability and hardness (tablets) and dissolution profile) were evaluated against the Brazilian Pharmacopeia and a reference compound (for tablets). Nimesulide content, determined by a UV/visible spectrophotometric method, and dissolution test were validated for compounding capsules.

Results: All formulations had a mean weight coefficient of variation lower than 5%. Three compounding formulations contained less than 95 mg nimesulide, with C1 (88.5 mg) also showing a lack of dosage unit uniformity. Disintegration times were lower than 5 min for all samples and friability less than 0.5% for all tablet formulations. The hardness of the reference product (25.5N) was lower compared to the other tablet samples (30-80.3N). All tablet formulations reached 75% release after 5 min of the dissolution test, but none of the compounding formulations reached the minimum 75% release after 45 min, probably due to inadequate excipient composition and amount. On average, excipient accounted for 46.3% of the capsule weight (against 74% in tablets), and some of the products did not contain water-soluble substances to promote dissolution.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate a lack of quality in compounding nimesulide products, which could jeopardize patients' health and treatment.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sostres C, Gargallo CJ, Arroyo MT, Lanas A. Adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, aspirin and coxibs) on upper gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010;24:121-32.

Carvalho WA. Anti-inflamatórios não esteroides, analgésicos, antipiréticos e drogas utilizadas no tratamentodagota. In: Farmacologia. 8th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2010.

Korolkovas A, França FFAC. Dicionário Terapêutico Guanabara. 16th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2009. p. 1.

Rainsford KD. Nimesulide–a multifactorial approach to inflammation and pain: scientific and clinical consensus. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1161-70.

Reddy BBK, Karunakar A. Biopharmaceutics classification system: a regulatory approach. Dissolution Technol 2011;18:31-7.

Silva RL, Volpato NM. Meios para dissolução de comprimidos de nimesulida: Ação dos tensoativos. Braz J Pharm Sci 2002;38:163-72.

Ruela AL, Araújo MB, Pereira GR. Desenvolvimento de um teste de dissolução para comprimidos de nimesulida em meio que assegure condições sink. Lat Am J Pharm 2009;28:661-7.

Bai G, Wang Y, Armenante PM. Velocity profiles and shear strain rate variability in the USP dissolution testing apparatus 2 at different impeller agitation speeds. Int J Pharm 2011;403:1-14.

Ferraz CC, Silva MLO, Vila MMDC, Oliveira RVM, Farina SS. Evaluation of quality control in pharmacies with handling in the city of Sorocaba, SP. Res Exp Undergraduates 2008;34:135-48.

Ferreira AO, Brandão MAF. Controle de qualidade na farmácia magistral-especificação de matérias-primas, leitura crítica dos certificados de análise; 2008. Available from: http://www.latamjpharm.org/trabajos/27/4/LAJOP_27_4_1_12 5N7R7V9ZZK.pdf [Last accessed on 09 Dec 2015]

Gudeman J, Jozwiakowski M, Chollet J, Randell M. Potential risks of pharmacy compounding. Drugs RD 2013;13:1-8.

United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). The special risks of pharmacy compounding; 2012. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucC107836.htm. [Last accessed on 09 Dec 2015].

National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada–RDC No. 67, de 8 de Outubro de. Dispõe sobre Boas Práticas de Manipulação de preparações magistrais e officials para uso humano em farmácias; 2007.

International Conference on Harmonization. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2(R1). Geneva: IFPMA; 2005. Available from: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/ Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline. pdf. [Last accessed on 09 Dec 2015].

Brazilian Pharmacopeia. 5th ed. Brasília, National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA); 2010.

British Pharmacopeia, London, The Stationery Office; Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; 2012.

United States Pharmacopeia. 35th ed. United States Pharmacopoeial Convention: Rockville; 2011.

Menegola J, Steppe M, Schapoval EES. Dissolution test for citalopram in tablets and comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;67:524-30.

Food and Drug Administration: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In vitro/In vivo Correlations. Guidance for Industry, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Government Printing Office: Washington; 1997.

Dutra VC. Manipulação de cápsulas. Serviço Brasileiro de Respostas Técnicas. Rede de Tecnologia e Inovação do Rio de Janeiro; 2012.

Lu Y, Kim S, Park K. In vitro–in vivo correlation: Perspectives on model development. Int J Pharm 2011;418:142-8.

Freitag G. Guidelines on dissolution profile comparison. Drug Inf J 2001;35:865–74.

Souza J, Freitas ZMF, Storpirtis S. In vitro models for the determination of drug absorption and a prediction of dissolution/absorption relationships. Braz J Pharm Sci 2007;4:515-27.

Anderson NH, Bauer M, Boussac N, Khan-Malek R, Munden P, Sardaro M. An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles. J Pharm Biomed 1998;17:811-22.

Costa P, Lobo JMS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;13:123-33.

Allen VL, Popovich NG, Ansel HC. Ansel’s pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delivery systems. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011.

Ashford M. Biodisponibilidade–Fatores Físico-químicos e Relacionados à Forma Farmacêutica. In: Delineamento de Formas Farmacêuticas, Aulton ME. 2nd ed. Porto Alegre (Brazil): Artmed; 2005.

Kubbingaa M, Moghani L, Langguth P. Novel insights into excipient effects on the biopharmaceutics of APIs from different BCS classes: Lactose in solid oral dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Sci 2014;61:27-31.

Published

01-01-2016

How to Cite

Santos, B. W. L., E. D. Caldas, and M. V. D. Silva. “NIMESULIDE: DISSOLUTION PROFILE, VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CAPSULES, AND ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCT QUALITY”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 27-32, https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ijpps/article/view/8858.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)