PROBLEMS ARISE IN CHECKING THE CERTIFICATE ELECTRONICALLY IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSITIONING LAND RIGHTS AND SOLUTIONS

AYU KARISA FANIA ARISTIAWATI; SUNNY UMMUL FIRDAUS; SOLIKHAH

doi:10.22159/ijss.2023.v11i4.47560

Authors

AYU KARISA FANIA ARISTIAWATI Department of , Program at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia.
SUNNY UMMUL FIRDAUS Department of , Program at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia.
SOLIKHAH Department of , Program at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijss.2023.v11i4.47560

Keywords:

Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT), Checking, Land Certificate, Electronic, Land Mafia, Land Registration.

Abstract

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/Head of the National Land Agency Number 16 of 2021 Third Amendment to the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/Head of the National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 concerning Provisions for Implementing Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which requires checking certificates carried out entirely by electronic means by the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) but in practice, there are still many obstacles that must be faced by PPAT for the electronic certificate checking. This paper aims to describe various problems with electronic certificate checking by PPAT as well as solutions to all problems that occur in providing legal land guarantees and certainty and information disclosure in the community. The method used in this research is normative research using secondary data in the form of primary legal material in the form of legislation. The technique used in legal materials collection is a literature review or documentation using legal material analysis techniques as well as the deductive method. The results of this study put forward the problems that occur in checking electronic certificates, among others, physical certificates received by PPAT for checking cannot be ascertained whether or not valid, there is a discrepancy of data on the certificate checking results, the certificate data are not suitable for the land book data in the office of the National Land Agency (BPN), causing doubts and obstructing the transferring process of rights. The results of this study also offer a number of solutions that can be considered, among others: PPAT must carefully ensure the suitability of the existing data on the physical certificate or the data of results of electronic certificate checking, BPN is actively updating database system that adheres to the principle of liability, and it is expected that the BPN can minimize the error in recording juridical and physical data in the future. In the end, checking the certificate is a very effective step against the prevention of land disputes in the process of land transition and also reduces cases of land mafia in Indonesia. This will also be realized if supported by all parties both from PPAT, the community and BPN. The role of BPN is very necessary for this step, especially in the rule of the letters archived in BPN synchronized correctly when checking the certificate electronically.

References

Agnes Aprilia, S. (2016). Endah cahyowati dan maria hutapea. Pelaksanaan peralihan hak atas tanah (Karena jual beli) dalam mewujudkan kepastian hukum di kabupaten kutai barat kalimantan timur. Vol. 1. Indonesia: E J UAJY.

Agustina, E. (2021). Kajian yuridis program penerbitan sertipikat hak atas tanah elektronik. Jurnal Solusi, 19,

Anggraeni, S. Z., & Marwanto, M. (2020). Kewenangan dan tanggung jawab hukum pejabat pembuat akta tanah dalam pelaksanaan pendaftaran hak tanggungan secara elektronik. Acta Comita: Jurnal Hukum Kenotarisatan, 5, 261-273.

Djohan, O. E. (2015). Tugas dan fungsi badan pertanahan nasional dalam pendaftaran tanah. Jurnal Pranata Hukum, 10(1),

Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Legal research methods: Normative and empirical. Jakarta: PT. Prenada Media.

Gunawan, I. K., Dewi, A. A., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Kekuatan pembuktian sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai alat bukti dalam perkara perdata. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, 1(2), 358-361.

Harsono, B. (2005). Hukum agraria Indonesia: Sejarah pembentukan undang- undang pokok agraria, isi dan pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.

KBBI Daring. Retrieved October 2022, from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/ entri/mengecek

Martiananda, T. A. (2015). Kekuatan hukum sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai alat bukti, (Analisis terhadap pasal 32 peraturan pemerintah nomor 24 Tahun 1997), Tesis Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogjakart.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Legal research. Jakarta: Kencana.

Media Indonesia. Pengecekan sertifikat tanah full elektronik mulai tahun ini. Retrieved January 2023, from https://mediaindonesia.com/ ekonomi/374493/pengecekan-sertifikat-tanah-fullelektronik-mulai-tahun-ini,pada tanggal

Muhammad, I. R., & Hastri, E. D. (2021). Kajian yuridis program penerbitan sertipikat hak atas tanah elektronik. Mulawarman Law Review, 6(2), ???.

Mujiburohman, N. A. (2020). Pemeliharaan data pendaftaran tanah. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.

Nafan, N. (2022). Kepastian hukum terhadap penerapan sertipikat elektronik sebagai bukti penguasaan hak atas tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 3342-3355.

Nurudin, S. H. (2016). Urgensi penetapan limitasi waktu pemeriksaan kesesuaian sertipikat hak atas tanah di kantor pertanahan sebelum pembuatan akta oleh PPAT. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1(1),

Nurwiyanti, D. (2021). Keabsahan validitas data hasil pengecekan sertipikat elektronik dan pengecekan langsung. Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(2),

Putri, C. A., Sanjaya, F. N., & Gunarto, G. (2018). Efektivitas pengecekan sertifikat terhadap pencegahan sengketa tanah dalam proses peralihan hak atas tanah. Jurnal Akta, 5(1),

Ramadani, S., & Hikmah, M. (2022). Keabsahan dokumen fisik sertipikat hak atas tanah terhadap peran pejabat pembuat akta tanah (PPAT) dalam pengecekan sertipikat hak atas tanah pada layanan berbasis online. Pamulang Law Review, 5(1), 65-76.

Shafira, A. (2021). Peran PPAT selaku pengguna layanan pengecekan sertipikat secara elektronik sebagai upaya perlindungan bagi para pihak yang melakukan peralihan hak milik. Jurnal Indonesian Notary, 3(2), 25.

Sumardani, N. M., & Bagiastra, I. N. (2021). Tanggung jawab hukum badan pertanahan nasional terkait ketidaksesuaian hasil pengecekan sertifikat secara elektronik. Acta Comita: Jurnal Hukum Kenotarisatan, 6(2).

Supadno, S., & Junarto, R. (2022). Mengatasi permasalahan pertanahan dengan gotong royong dan mengangkat ekonomi kerakyatan dengan sertipikasi tanah. Jurnal Tunas Agraria, 3(2), 268-265.

Urip, S. (2019). Pendaftaran dan peralihan hak atas tanah. Jakarta: Prenanda Media.

Yamin, L., & Lubis, R. (2010). Hukum pendaftaran tanah. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.