TO STUDY THE ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF CLAUSENA DENTATA (WILLD.) ROEM.

Authors

  • ANNAMALAI MADURAM Department of Pharmacology, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth – Deemed to be University, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • RAJU KAMARAJ Department of Pharmacognosy, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i1.35553

Keywords:

Clausena dentata, Antibacterial activity, In vitro, Disc diffusion, Extracts

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to study the antibacterial activity for the various extracts of Clausena dentata against human pathogens. Clausena (Rutaceae) is a genus of about 23 species of unarmed trees and shrubs. The stem bark of C. dentata is used in veterinary medicine for the treatment of wounds and sprains. Even though C. dentata has a lot of potential medical uses, the study of microbiological properties is very scarce.

Methods: The plant C. dentata was collected from Kadagaman, near Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India, and authenticated by Centre for Advanced Study in Botany, University of Madras, Chennai. The dry powder of stem bark was extracted with hexane, chloroform, and methanol. The extracts were subjected to qualitative phytochemical screening and antibacterial activity against human pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhi, Klebsiella pneumonia, Vibrio cholerae, and Staphylococcus aureus and compared with ciprofloxacin.

Results: Qualitative chemical tests revealed the presence of various phytochemicals such as alkaloids, glycosides, carbohydrate, proteins and amino acids, phytosterols, and volatile oil. The antibacterial activity result reveals that all the extracts were are more active against V. cholerae. The activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was mild.

Conclusion: The activity against V. cholerae was comparable with that of 5 μg/mL ciprofloxacin at the concentration of C. dentata 40 μg/mL. The orders of antibacterial activity against human pathogenic bacteria are hexane, methanol, and chloroform extract of C. dentata.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

ANNAMALAI MADURAM, Department of Pharmacology, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth – Deemed to be University, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

Associate professor in pharmacology, Department of pharmacology, Sri sathya sai Medical college &Reseach Centre, kancheepuram (Dt), Tamil nadu, india

RAJU KAMARAJ, Department of Pharmacognosy, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Professor ,

Department of Pharmacognosy,

SRM College of Pharmacy,

SRM Institute of Science & Technology

References

Chopra RN, Nayar SL, Chopra IC. Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants. New Delhi, India: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1956. p. 246.

Kirtikar KR, Basu BD, Singh B. Indian Medicinal Plants. Dehradun, India: M/s Bighensing Mahendra Palsingh Publishers; 1980. p. 2793.

Rao S, Subramanian KS. Isolation of α, ß and γ-clausenan and diclausenan from Clausena willdenovii. Proc Indian Acad Sci 1936;3:31.

Govindachari TR, Pai BR, Subramaniam PS, Muthukumaraswamy N. Coumarins of Clausena dentata. Tetrahedron Lett 1968;24:753-7.

Rao GS, Rao K, Ravindranath B. Structure of diclausenan A and B. Tetrahedron Lett 1976;13:1019-20.

Matern U, Luer P, Kreusch D. Biosynthesis of coumarins. Polyketides and other secondary metabolites including fatty acids and their derivatives. In: Barton D, Nakanishik K, Meth-Cohn O, Sankawa U, editors. Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry. Vol. 1. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.; 1999. p. 623-7.

Yang YZ, Ranz A, Pan HZ, Zhang ZN, Lin XB, Meshnick SR. Daphnetin: A novel antimalarial agent with in vitro and in vivo activity. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1992;46:15-20.

Yenjai C, Sripontan S, Prajun PS, Kittakoop P, Jintasiriknl A, Tanticharoen M, et al. Coumarins and carbazoles with antiplasmodial activity from Clausena harmandiana. Planta Medica 2000;66:277-9.

Ananthanarayanan R, Paniker CK. Text book of Microbiology. India: Orient Longman; 1999. p. 612.

Hammond SM, Peter PA. Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Action. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.; 1978. p. 200.

Harborne JB. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall Publishers; 1988. p. 278.

Harborne JB. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall Publishers; 1998. p. 293.

Sundararaj T. Microbiology Laboratory Manual. Chennai, India: University of Madras; 1996. p. 50.

Perez C, Pauli M, Bazerquw P. An antibiotic assay by the agar well diffusion method. Acta Biol Med Exp 1990;15:113-5.

O’Kennedy R, Thrones R. Coumarins Biology, Applications and Mode of Action. Chickester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 1997. p. 270.

Sardari S, Mori Y, Horita K, Micetih R, Nishibe G, Daneshtalab Y. Synthesis and antifungal activity of coumarins and angular Furano coumarins. Bioorg Med Chem 1999;7:1933-40.

Published

07-01-2020

How to Cite

ANNAMALAI MADURAM, and RAJU KAMARAJ. “) ROEM”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 69-73, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i1.35553.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)