THE PHARMACOECONOMIC IMPACT OF GASTRO-PROTECTIVE AGENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Authors

  • NIRUPAMA KULKARNI Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy Hubballi, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
  • MOPIDEVI RASI Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy Hubballi, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
  • NAZARIYA NIZAR Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy Hubballi, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
  • NISHOJA DAVID Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy Hubballi, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
  • PRASAD N BALI Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy Hubballi, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
  • VARSHA I DALAL Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy Hubballi, Hubli, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i1.43412

Keywords:

Proton pump inhibitors, Histamine-2 receptor antagonist, Cost-effectiveness, costs and benefits, B G Prasad Income scale

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic impact of gastro-protective agents (GPA) by carrying out cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-effective analysis (CEA).

Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out by simple randomization technique at Karnataka Institute of Medical Science, Hubballi. Data used were socio-economic details based on modified B. G Prasad scale. Current Index of Medical Specialists updated version March 2021 was used for CBA and CEA. Regression analysis was the statistical tool used in the study.

Results: A total of 120 participants were included in the study. 57.5% were male and 42.5% were female. 3.33% were pediatrics, 32.5% were young adults, 37.5% were elder adults and 26.67% were geriatrics. Out of 120 samples, 94 participants were prescribed with pantoprazole, other drugs prescribed include domperidone and pantoprazole, rabeprazole, and ranitidine. The CBA revealed ratio of benefits over costs for pantoprazole was 3.86, ranitidine was 9.31, pantoprazole and domperidone was 0.84 and rabeprazole was 0.84. Additional cost of 138.30 Indian Rupee must be spent on pantoprazole over ranitidine to get cost-effective treatment without disease for one whole year.

Conclusion: The CBA revealed that maximum patients received benefits for pantoprazole. CEA gives an idea on best effective treatment over two drugs of different class. Our study concludes that pantoprazole is deemed to be superior over other drugs of GPA prescribed among study participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dylag K, Hubalewska-Mazgaj M, Surmiak M, Szmyd J, Brzozowski T. Probiotics in the mechanism of protection against gut inflammation and therapy of gastrointestinal disorders. Curr Pharm Des 2014;20:1149-55.

Wolfe MM, Lowe RC. Pocket Guide to Gastrointestinal Drugs. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; Ltd.; 2014.

Karen R. Essentials of Pharmacoeconomics Point. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2013.

CIMS Updated Prescribers Handbook 42nd Year. MIMS; 2021. Available from: https://www.mims.com/india

Debnath D, Kakkar R. Modified BG prasad socio-economic classification, updated 2020. Indian J Community Health 2020;32:124-5.

Desai SV, Keshannavar MG, Reddy MR, Hiremath Y, George JM, Reddy AS. A comparative cross sectional study on knowledge attitude and practice towards self-medication practices among rural and urban population of field practice areas of S N medical college Bagalkot- North Karnataka. World J Pharm Med Res 2018;4:188-95.

Cost Benefit Analysis. Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation; 2011. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_benefit_analysis [Last accessed on 2021 Oct 20].

Vonkeman HE, Braakman-Jansen LM, Klok RM, Postma MJ, Brouwers JR, van de Laar MA. Incremental cost effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers: A pharmacoeconomic analysis linked to a case-control study. Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R144.

Skrepnek GH, Sahai A. Efficient estimation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using a new perspective. Value Health 2014;17:A202.

Permsuwan U, Dilokthornsakul P, Thavorn K, Saokaew S, Chaiyakunapruk N. Cost-effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor monotherapy versus sulfonylurea monotherapy for people with Type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in Thailand. J Med Econ 2016;20:171-81.

Gafni A. Willingness to pay in the context of an economic evaluation of healthcare programs: Theory and practice. Am J Manag Care 1997;3 Suppl: S21-32.

Gyrd-Hansen D. Willingness to pay for a Qaly. PharmacoEconomics. 2005;23:423-32.

Pendhari SR, Joshi KS, Limaye RP. Use of proton pump inhibitors-A drug utilization study. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol 2016;3:88.

Published

07-01-2022

How to Cite

KULKARNI, N., M. RASI, N. NIZAR, N. DAVID, P. N BALI, and V. I DALAL. “THE PHARMACOECONOMIC IMPACT OF GASTRO-PROTECTIVE AGENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 92-96, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i1.43412.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)