ASSESMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPGY-ASSISTED FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY IN OVARIAN MASS LESIONS

Authors

  • RAVIKANT MAHALE Department of Pathology, Chhindwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • ARCHANA KORI Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chhindwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • MAYANK KUMAR UJJALIYA Department of Radiodiagnosis, Ram Krishna Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • NIDHI NARREY Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chhindwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • VIJAY SHRIVASTAVA Department of Pathology, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • SUSHMA AHARWAL Department of Radiodiagnosis, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i4.47856

Keywords:

FNAC, Ovarian tumors, Cytology, Ultrasonography, Diagnostic accuracy

Abstract

Objectives: Ultrasonography (USG)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of ovarian lumps is being increasingly used for the successful diagnosis of ovarian mass lesions and it is a rapid, accurate, economical, and safe procedure to diagnose various ovarian mass lesions. The aims of the study were to categorize and study the cytomorphological features of the ovarian mass lesions, study the age distribution and analyzing cytological features of the ovarian mass lesions, and to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of USG-guided FNAC in diagnosing ovarian mass lesions.

Methods: A prospective observational study of 24 patients with clinically and radiologically diagnosed ovarian mass lesions and referred for FNAC in Department of Pathology of a tertiary care hospital. USG-guided FNAC was performed in each patient and cytological features were analyzed.

Results: In our study, out of total 24 USG-guided FNAC of ovarian lesions, ovarian malignancies were most common – 11 cases (45.83%), followed by benign ovarian tumors – ten cases (41.66%), inflammatory lesion – one case (4.16%), and two cases (8.33%) were unsatisfactory smears. In our study, diagnostic accuracy of USG-guided FNAC was found to be 91.66%.

Conclusion: USG-guided FNAC is a simple, safe, quick, reliable, efficient, and easily available diagnostic procedure and with less number of complications that it has a very important role in accurate diagnosis of ovarian mass lesions. It is a safer alternative to the more expensive and time consuming surgical procedure like diagnostic laparotomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad SS, Akhtar K, Akhtar S, Abrari A, Nasir A, Khalid M, et al. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of abdominal masses. JK Sci 2006;8:200-4.

Wojcik EM, Selvaggi SM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cystic ovarian lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;11:9-14. doi: 10.1002/ dc.2840110104, PMID 7956669

Namshiker AA, De Sousa Rocha P, Pinto RG. Role of Fine needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal lesions-a comparative study. Nat J Lab Med 2016;5:PO31-7.

Dey S, Datta S, Chaudhuri S, Paul PC, Khandakar B, Mandal S. Preoperative ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology of ovarian lesions- is it a rapid and effective diagnostic modality? J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:EC16-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15729.7447, PMID 27134878

Bandyopadhyay A, Chakraborty J, Chowdhury AR, Bhattacharya A, Bhattachrya P, Chowdhury M. Fine needle aspiration cytology of ovarian tumors with histological correlation. J Cytol 2012;29:35-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.93218, PMID 22470227

Ramzy I, Delaney M, Rose P. Fine needle aspiration of ovarian masses. II. Correlative cytologic and histologic study of nonneoplastic cysts and noncelomic epithelianl neoplasms. Acta Cytol 1979;23:185-93.

Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN, Whitaker D, editors. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. 4th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2005.

Mehdi G, Maheshwari V, Afzal S, Ansari HA, Ansari M. Image-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of ovarian tumors: An assessment of diagnostic efficacy. J Cytol 2010;27:91-5. doi: 10.4103/0970- 9371.71872, PMID 21187883

Rani GS, Bodhireddy SR. Role of ultra sound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in (FNAC) ovarian mass lesions. Int J Med Biomed Stud 2019;3:185-7.

Hemalatha AL, Divya P, Mamatha R. Image-directed percutaneous FNAC of ovarian neoplasms. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2005;48:305-9. PMID 16761738

Sood T, Handa U, Mohan H, Goel P. Evaluation of aspiration cytology FNAC of ovarian neoplasms. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2005;48:305-9.

Kedar RP, Patel VH, Merchant SA, Aggarwal V, Pandit AA. Ultrasound guided aspiration cytology--a valuable diagnostic aid. J Postgrad Med 1991;37:84-7. PMID 1803003

Khan N, Afroz N, Aqil B, Khan T, Ahmad I. Neoplastic and nonneoplastic ovarian masses: Diagnosis on cytology. J Cytol 2009;26:129-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.62180, PMID 21938175

Vasilj A, Katovic SK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of abdominal organs--ten-year single center experience. Acta Clin Croat 2016;55:35-409.

Ganjei P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the ovary. Clin Lab Med 1995;15:705-26. doi: 10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30325-1, PMID 8542730

Ganjei P, Dickinson B, Harrison TA, Nassiri M, Lu Y. Aspiration cytology of neoplastic and non-neoplastic ovarian cysts: Is it accurate? Int J Gynecol Pathol 1996;15:94-101. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199604000-00002, PMID 8786211

Trimbos JB, Hacker NF. The case against aspirating ovarian cysts. Cancer 1993;72:828-31. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3<828:aid-cncr2820720331>3.0.co;2-t, PMID 8334637

De Crespigny LC, Robinson HP, Davoren RA, Fortune D. The ’simple’ ovarian cyst: Aspirate or operate? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:1035-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03377.x, PMID 2679871

Wojcik EM, Selvaggi SM. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in persistent or recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Diagn Cytopathol 1992;8:322-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.2840080403, PMID 1638931

Wojcik EM, Selvaggi SM, Johnson SC, Martier SS, Ager JW. Factors influencing fine-needle aspiration cytology in the management of recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:281-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90217-7, PMID 1526505

Published

07-04-2023

How to Cite

MAHALE, R., A. KORI, M. K. UJJALIYA, N. NARREY, V. SHRIVASTAVA, and S. AHARWAL. “ASSESMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPGY-ASSISTED FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY IN OVARIAN MASS LESIONS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 4, Apr. 2023, pp. 145-8, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i4.47856.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)