TESTING OF WHEAT GENOTYPES FOR SALT TOLERANCE AND LEAF RUST DISEASE CAUSED BY PUCCINIA

Authors

  • SAIFULDEEN SALIM Center of Desert Studies, Anbar University, Iraq.
  • FIRAS ALDULAIMY Directorate of Seed Testing and Certification, Ministry of Agriculture, Iraq
  • UTOOR ALDEEN State Board of Agriculture Research, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2024v12i3.50650

Keywords:

salt tolerance, genotypes

Abstract

Parameters that show a significant genotypic variation and are associated with salt tolerance may be used as rapid and economic screening criteria in breeding programs. The objective of this study was to test growth and yield components for evaluating the salt tolerance of wheat genotypes. Five genotypes of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were used in this study, that differ from their salt tolerance, which were grown in 28 dS/m saline soil, and irrigated by well water with a salinity 7.5 dS/m. The results showed that salt concentration in the soil was reduced with plant growth stages from 28 dS/m before sowing to 8, 7.5, and 7.6 dS/m for N1, N2, and N3 genotypes, respectively. Whereas approached 16 and 17 dS/m for Tumos2 and Mexipak, cultivars, respectively, at the maturity stage. Concerning germination percentage under saline conditions, wheat genotypes N1, N2, and N3 showed the highest percentages of 89, 90, and 90%, respectively, which was significantly different than wheat cultivars Tumos2 and Mexipak 79 and 83%, respectively. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that genotype N2 required a maximum days for germination 14 days, whereas cultivar
Tumos2 required less days for germination 12 days. For spikes formation duration growth the genotype N3 was the late 119 days, whereas for physiological maturity N1 genotype was the latest 153 days. The number of spikes per 6 m2, grains spike-1, and grain weight were reduced significantly in sensitive cultivars Tumos2 and Mexipak. Higher grain yield with N2 genotype 2739.43 g with no significant differences with the genotypes N1 and N2, and with significant differences with the rest sensitive cultivars Tumos2 and Mexipak 346.61 and 242.98 g, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that the measurements of growth and yield components may be effective criteria for screening wheat genotypes for salt tolerance. Moreover, N1, N2, and N3 genotypes were identified as the most salt-tolerant genotypes in this study, they can be utilized through appropriate selection and breeding programs for further improvement in salt tolerance of Iraqi wheat genotypes.

References

Agrios, G. N. (2005). Disease caused by basidiomycetes: Cereal rusts. In: Plant pathology (5th ed.) (pp. 565-571). Florida, USA: Elsevier Academic Press Publication.

Ahmad, M. (2011). Evaluation of wheat genotypes for salt tolerance based on conventional and molecular approaches [Ph.D. Thesis]. Rawalpindi, Pakistan: Arid Agriculture University.

Brar, G. S. (2015). Population structure of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the cause of wheat stripe rust, in western Canada [M.Sc.Thesis in Plant Science]. Saskatoon, Canada: College of Graduate Studies and Research,University of Saskatchewan.

Dell, A. A., & Spada, P. (1992). Regulation of protein synthesis in germinating Wheat embryos under polyethylene glycol and salt stress. Seed Science Research, 2, 75-80.

El-Hendawy, S. E., Hu, Y., Sakagamic, J. I., & Schmidhalterb, U. S. (2011). Screening Egyptian wheat genotypes for salt tolerance at early growth stages. International Journal of Plant Production, 5(3), 283-298.

El-Hendawy, S. E., Hu, Y., Yakout, G. M., Awad, A. M., Hafiz, S. E., & Schmidhalte, U. (2005). Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. European Journal of Agronomy, 22, 243-253.

Feizi, M., Aghakhan, A., Mostafazadeh-Fard, B., & Heidarpour, M. (2007). Salt tolerance of wheat according to soil and drainage water salinity. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(17), 2824-2830.

Flowers, T. J., & Flowers, S. A. (2005). Why does salinity pose such a difficult problem for plant breeders? Agricultural Water Management, 78, 15-24.

Getie, B. (2015). Identification, genetic studies and molecular characterisation of resistance to rust pathogens in wheat (Ph.D. Thesis). Cobbitty, Australia: Plant Breeding Institute, The University of Sydney.

Ghulam, A., Muhammad, S., Qaisir, R., Atiq, R. M., Javaid, A., Anwar, H. M., & Nasim, M. (2013). Effect of salinity on grain yeild and grain quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50, 185-189.

Islam, M. S. (2001). Water stress tolerance of Phaseolus vulgaris L. as affected by potassium [M.S Thesis]. Salna, Gazipur: Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University.

Islam, M. T., Sharma, P. C., Gautam, R. K., Singh, D., Singh, S., Panesar, B., & Ali, S. (2011). Salt tolerance in parental lines of rich hybrids through physiological attributes and molecular markers. International Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2(1), 1-7.

Khan, M. A., & Gul, B. (2006). Halophytic seed germination. In: M. A. Khan and D. J. Weber (Eds.), Ecophysiology of high salinity tolerant plants (pp. 11-30). Netherlands: Springler Verloge.

Kolmer, J. A. (2005). Tracking wheat rust on a continental scale. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8, 441-449.

Mans, R., & Rawson, H. M. (2004). Effect of salinity on salt accumulation and reproductive development in the apical meristem of wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26(5), 459-464.

Mass, E. V., & Grieve, C. M. (1994). Tiller development in salt-stressed wheat. Crop Science, 34, 1594-1603.

Mass, E. V., & Poss, J. A. (1989). Salt sensitivity of cowpea at various growth stages. Irrigation Science, 10, 313-320.

Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 239-250.

Munns, R., Richard, A. J., & Lauchli, A. (2006). Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(5), 1025-1043.

Neumann, P. (1997). Salinity resistance and plant growth revisited. Plant, Cell and Environment, 20, 1193-1198.

Omid, J., Alireza, E., Reza, A., Asa, E., & Alireza, P. (2022). Physiological and molecular responses of barley genotypes to salinity stress. Genes, 13, 2040.

Ottander, C., & Oquist, G. (1991). Recovery of photosynthesis in winter stressed Scot pine. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14, 345-349.

Pervaiz, Z., Afzal, M., Xi, S., Xiaoe, Y., & Ancheng, L. (2002). Physiological parameters of salt tolerance in wheat. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 1, 478-481.

Roelfs, A., Singh, R., & Saari, E. (1992). Rust disease of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management (p. 81). Mexico, DF: CIMMYT.

Sabir, P., & Ashraf, M. (2007). Screening of local accessions of Panicum maliaceum L. for salt tolerance at the seedling stage using biomass production and ion accumulation as selection criteria. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(5), 1655-1661.

Sadeghi, H., & Emam, Y. (2011). Chemical composition, yield and yield components of two wheat cultivars in response to salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding, 1, 39-47.

Singh, S., Sethi, G. S., & Chaudhary, H. K. (2004). Differential responsiveness of winter and spring wheat genotypes to maize-mediated production of haploids, Cereal Research Communications, 32(2), 201-207. Smrutishree, S., Bhagawati, B., & Nitesh. (2016, 2018). Salinity tolerance in wheat. Marumegh, 3(1), 61-65. Yamaguchi, T., & Blumwald, E. (2005). Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: Challenges and opportunities. Trends in Plant Science, 10, 615-620.

Published

01-05-2024

How to Cite

SAIFULDEEN SALIM, FIRAS ALDULAIMY, & UTOOR ALDEEN. (2024). TESTING OF WHEAT GENOTYPES FOR SALT TOLERANCE AND LEAF RUST DISEASE CAUSED BY PUCCINIA. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(3), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2024v12i3.50650

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)