EFFECTS OF RADIATION FROM MOBILE PHONES ON FERTILITY AND THE QUALITY OF SEMEN IN REGULAR MOBILE PHONE USERS

Authors

  • SENTHIL KUMAR B. Department of Anatomy, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation (DU) Salem 636308, Tamilnadu, India
  • KOUSER BANU Clinical Skill Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • G. PANNEER SELVI Department of Anatomy, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation (DU)Salem 636308, Tamilnadu, India
  • K. EZHIL VENDHAN Department of Ophthalmology, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation (DU)Salem 636308, Tamilnadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2022.v14ti.52

Keywords:

Mobile phone radiations, Semen parameters, Sperm morphology

Abstract

Objective: The use of mobile phones over extended periods of time is associated with genotoxicity. The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) values of mobile phones indicate that they release less radiofrequency radiation, which is discovered to be within a safer limit. This is the case because SAR values can be measured. The use of mobile phones for extended periods of time may also cause DNA damage in human cells.

Methods: The purpose of this study is to analyse the impact that radiation from mobile phones have on fertility by analysing the quality of the sperm of people who use their phones often.

Results: The research was carried out on a total of 150 people who were between the ages of 20 and 40 and divided into three groups (frequent mobile users, moderate mobile users and less mobile phone users). Prior to collecting samples from the subjects, permission was obtained from them. The researcher conducted individual interviews with each participant in the study in order to collect information for filling out a structured questionnaire. Analyses and comparisons were made between the three groups on the properties of the sperm, including their motility and shape.

Conclusion: The findings of a number of research indicate that radiations released by mobile phones have an effect on male fertility by causing permanent alterations in the morphology of the semen. The current research demonstrates that there is a problem with the fertilising ability of sperm due to defects and changes in sperm morphology. According to the findings of this research, radiations released by mobile phones will have an effect on male fertility. The genotoxic impact may be brought to the attention of regular users of mobile phones and the required measures can be taken via the use of biosensors, which offer a warning signal or alarm when the radiations level exceeds the usual limit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blackwell RP. Standards for microwave radiation. Nature. 1979;282(5737):360. doi: 10.1038/282360a0, PMID 503215.

La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. J Androl. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):350-6. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.111.014373. PMID 21799142.

Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166. PMID 17482179.

Fejes I, Zavaczki Z, Szollosi J, Koloszar S, Daru J, Kovacs L. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Arch Androl. 2005 Sep-Oct;51(5):385-93. doi: 10.1080/014850190924520, PMID 16087567.

Prausnitz S, Susskind C. Effects of chronic microwave irradiation on mice. IRE Trans Bio Med Electron. 1962 Apr;BME-9:104-8. doi: 10.1109/tbmel.1962.4322972, PMID 14037410.

Bullock J, Boyle J, Wang MB, Ajello RR. Physiology. New York: Wiley; Media, Pa. Harwal Pub. CO; 1984.

Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002 May;77(5):873-82. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03105-9, PMID 12009338.

Mohanasundaram S, Ramirez Asis E, Quispe Talla A, Bhatt MW, Shabaz M. Experimental replacement of hops by mango in beer: production and comparison of total phenolics, flavonoids, minerals, carbohydrates, proteins and toxic substances. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2022;13(S1):132-45. doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01308-3.

Davoudi M, Brossner C, Kuber W. The influence of electromagnetic waves on sperm motility. Urol Urogynaecol. 2002;19:18-22.

Agarwal A, Singh A, Hamada A, Kesari K. Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences. Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):432-54. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000400002, PMID 21888695.

Habash RWY. Bioeffects and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic energy. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2008.

Schulte RT, Ohl DA, Sigman M, Smith GD. Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Jan;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s10815-009-9359-x. PMID 20012685, PMCID PMC2826626.

Zhang G, Yan H, Chen Q, Liu K, Ling X, Sun L. Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: results from the MARHCS cohort study in Chongqing, China. Environ Int. 2016 May;91:116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.028. PMID 26949865.

Mohanasundaram S, Doss VA, Maddisetty P, Magesh R, Sivakumar K, Subathra M. Pharmacological analysis of hydroethanolic extract of Senna alata (L.) for in vitro free radical scavenging and cytotoxic activities against Hep G2 cancer cell line. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2019;32(3):931-4.

Lonn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M. Mobile phone use and the risk of acoustic neuroma. Epidemiology. 2004 Nov;15(6):653-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000142519.00772.bf. PMID 15475713.

Oftedal G, Wilen J, Sandstrom M, Mild KH. Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Lond). 2000 May;50(4):237-45. doi: 10.1093/occmed/50.4.237, PMID 10912374.

Braune S, Wrocklage C, Raczek J, Gailus T, Lucking CH. Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field. Lancet. 1998 Jun 20;351(9119):1857-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)24025-6, PMID 9652672.

Karthikeyan V, Sivakumar K, Gokuldass A, Mohana Sundaram S. Studies on larvicidal activity of leucas aspera, vitex negundo and eucalyptus against culex quinquefasciatus collected from coovum river of Chennai, India. Asian J Pharm Sci Clin Res. 2012;5(3):1-4.

Zhou N, Cui Z, Yang S, Han X, Chen G, Zhou Z. Air pollution and decreased semen quality: a comparative study of Chongqing urban and rural areas. Environ Pollut. 2014 Apr;187:145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.030. PMID 24491300.

Repacholi MH. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(1):1-19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:1<1::AID-BEM1>3.0.CO;2-5, PMID 9453702.

Baste V, Riise T, Moen BE. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(5):369-77. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9236-4, PMID 18415687.

El-Helaly M, Mansour M. Cell phone usage and semen quality, hospital based study, Sch. J Appl Sci. 2014;2:1978-82.

Mohanasundaram S, Rangarajan N, Sampath V, Porkodi K, Dass Prakash MV, Monicka N. GC-MS identification of anti-inflammatory and anticancer metabolites in edible milky white mushroom (Calocybe indica) against human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021;14(8):4300-6.

Rago R, Salacone P, Caponecchia L, Sebastianelli A, Marcucci I, Calogero AE. The semen quality of the mobile phone users. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013 Dec;36(11):970-4. doi: 10.3275/8996. PMID 23722985.

Feijo C, Verza Junior S, Esteves SC. Lack of evidence that radio frequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) emitted by cellular phones impact semen parameters of Brazilian men. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:i139-40.

Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L, Wiktor H. Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2007;14(1):169-72. PMID 17655195.

Boulos V, Hassan H. 843 Do cell phones affect semen quality? Eur Urol Suppl. 2013;12(1):e843-4. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(13)61322-6.

Gaskins AJ, Mendiola J, Afeiche M, Jørgensen N, Swan SH, Chavarro JE. Physical activity and television watching in relation to semen quality in young men. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;49(4):265-70. doi: 10.1136/by sports-2012-091644. PMID 23380634, PMCID PMC3868632.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Ohlson CG, Westberg H, Eriksson M, Hansson Mild K. Use of cellular and cordless telephones and risk of testicular cancer. Int J Androl. 2007 Apr;30(2):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00721.x. PMID 17209885.

Doss VA, Maddisetty P, Mohanasundaram S. Biological active compounds with various medicinal values of Strychnos nux-vomica–A Pharmacological summary. J Glob Trends Pharm Sci. 2016;7(1):3044-7.

Bhat MA, Kumar V, Gupta GK. Effects of mobile phone and mobile phone tower radiations on human health. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2013;4:1422-6.

Wang Q, Sivakumar K, Mohanasundaram S. Impacts of extrusion processing on food nutritional components. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2022;13(S1):364-74. doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01422-2.

Kilgallon SJ, Simmons LW. Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biol Lett. 2005 Sep 22;1(3):253-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0324, PMID 17148180, PMCID PMC1617155.

Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.022. PMID 18804757.

Sienkiewicz Z. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields and radiation. J Radiol Prot. 1998 Sep;18(3):185-93. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/3/005, PMID 9791809.

Mohanasundaram S, Rangarajan N, Sampath V, Porkodi K, Pennarasi M. GC-MS and HPLC analysis of antiglycogenolytic and glycogenic compounds in kaempferol 3-O–gentiobioside containing Senna alata L. leaves in experimental rats. Translational Metab Syndr Research. 2021;4:10-7.

Kumar S, Kesari KK, Behari J. The therapeutic effect of a pulsed electromagnetic field on the reproductive patterns of male wistar rats exposed to a 2.45-GHz microwave field. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(7):1237-45. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000700020, PMID 21876981, PMCID PMC3148471.

Avendano C, Mata A, Sanchez Sarmiento CA, Doncel GF. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through wi-fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):39-45.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.012. PMID 22112647.

Al-Akhras MA, Elbetieha A, Hasan MK, Al-Omari I, Darmani H, Albiss B. Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on fertility of adult male and female rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001 Jul;22(5):340-4. doi: 10.1002/bem.59, PMID 11424157.

Rangarajan N, Sangeetha R, Mohanasundaram S, Sampath, Porkodi K, Dass Prakash MV. Additive inhibitory effect of the peels of Citrus limon and Citrus sinensis against amylase and glucosidase activity. IJRPS 2021;11(4):6876-80. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v11i4.3661.

Kim YW, Kim HS, Lee JS, Kim YJ, Lee SK, Seo JN. Effects of 60 Hz 14 microT magnetic field on the apoptosis of testicular germ cell in mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009 Jan;30(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/bem.20448, PMID 18839413.

Li DK, Yan B, Li Z, Gao E, Miao M, Gong D. Exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of poor sperm quality. Reprod Toxicol. 2010 Jan;29(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.09.004. PMID 19910156.

Rangarajan N, Sampath, Dass Prakash M, Mohanasundaram S. UV spectrophotometry and FTIR analysis of phenolic compounds with antioxidant potentials in glycyrrhiza glabra and zingiber officinale. IJRPS 2020;12(1):877-83. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v12i1.4215.

Al-Bayyari N. The effect of cell phone usage on semen quality and fertility among Jordanian males. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2017;22(3):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2017.03.006.

Kesari KK, Behari J. Evidence for mobile phone radiation exposure effects on reproductive pattern of male rats: role of ROS. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Sep;31(3):213-22. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2012.700292, PMID 22897402.

Doss VA, Mohanasundaram S, Maddisetty P. Analysis of hydroethanolic extract of Senna alata (L.) to screen bioactive compounds with inhibitory activity on lipid peroxidation, in vitro antibacterial and antidiabetic efficacy. Int J Pharm Sci. 2016;6(1):1360-6.

Erogul O, Oztas E, Yildirim I, Kir T, Aydur E, Komesli G. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: an in vitro study. Arch Med Res. 2006 Oct;37(7):840-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.05.003. PMID 16971222.

Published

28-07-2022

How to Cite

B., S. K., BANU, K., SELVI, G. P., & VENDHAN, K. E. (2022). EFFECTS OF RADIATION FROM MOBILE PHONES ON FERTILITY AND THE QUALITY OF SEMEN IN REGULAR MOBILE PHONE USERS. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 14, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2022.v14ti.52

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)