FORMULATION OF PROPOLIS-BASED RECURRENT APHTHOUS STOMATITIS (RAS) PROTECTIVE PATCH WITH COMBINATION OF PVP AND CELLULOSE MATERIALS

MUHAMAD SAHLAN; NADIAH HUSNA SHOFWATALLOH; NADIAH HUSNA SHOFWATALLOH; YUNIARDINI SEPTORINI WIMARDHANI; RISQA RINA DARWITA; DIAH KARTIKA PRATAMI

doi:10.22159/ijap.2024.v16s3.11

Authors

MUHAMAD SAHLAN Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Baru, Depok-16424, Indonesia. Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java-16424, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-5946
NADIAH HUSNA SHOFWATALLOH Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Baru, Depok-16424, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-3691
NADIAH HUSNA SHOFWATALLOH Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Baru, Depok-16424, Indonesia
YUNIARDINI SEPTORINI WIMARDHANI Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI, Salemba-10430, Indonesia
RISQA RINA DARWITA Department of Dental Public Health and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kampus UI, Salemba-10430, Indonesia
DIAH KARTIKA PRATAMI Center for Study of Natural Product for Degenerative Disease, Faculty of Pharmacy, Pancasila University, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta-12640, Indonesia, National Metabolomics Collaborative Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI, Depok, West Java-16424, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-3691

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2024.v16s3.11

Keywords:

Propolis, Patch, Mucoadhesive, Antibacterial, Polymer

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to obtain a mucoadhesive patch for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) with propolis, proven propolis’ antibacterial ability against bacteria in the oral cavity, and to obtain the physical characteristics of the produced patch.

Methods: The patch was produced using a solvent casting method. The antibacterial properties were determined by the disc diffusion method against S. mutans, S. oralis, S. sanguinis, and S. gingivalis. The physical characteristics of the patch was determined by examining weight and thickness dimension, swelling, surface pH, and structure observation.

Results: The patch was made from 8 formulations with different propolis concentrations, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and the use of cellulose materials (Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and Carboxymethylcellulose). The concentrations of propolis used were 3%, 5%, 7%, and 10%. While the ratio of PVP and cellulose material in the formulation is 2:1. Results showed that propolis had a zone of inhibition greater than 2 mm against S. oralis, S. sanguinis, S. mutans, and P. gingivalis bacteria. Patches produced were clear to brown-colored films with high swelling percentage due to hydrophilic polymers used. The patch thickness that is closest to the requirements of the buccal patch was F8 with 0.36+0.04 mm. The mean values of the patches have matched normal salivary pH of 5.5–7. Physically, PVP/CMC formulations were more sticky, and the PVP/HPMC patches were more solid and stronger.

Conclusion: A mucoadhesive patch was obtained with a combination of PVP/CMC and PVP/HPMC, tween 80 as a surfactant, glycerin as a plasticizer, peppermint oil as a flavor enhancer and preservative, with the active ingredient propolis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Farias Gabriel A, Kirschnick lB, So BB, Schuch lF, Silveira FM, Martins MA, Wagner VP, Lopes MA, Martins MD. Oral and maxillofacial tuberculosis: a systematic review. Oral Diseases. 2023;29(7):2483-92.

Yuan H, Qiu J, Zhang T, Wu X, Zhou J, Park S. Quantitative changes of veillonella, streptococcus, and Neisseria in the oral cavity of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;129:105198. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105198, PMID 34167010.

Gasmi Benahmed A, Noor S, Menzel A, Gasmi A. Oral aphthous: pathophysiology, clinical aspects and medical treatment. Arch Razi Inst. 2021;76(5):1155-63. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356055.1767, PMID 35355774.

Abdullah NA, Jaafar F, Yasin HM, Taha H, Petalcorin MI, Mamit MH. Physicochemical analyses, antioxidant, antibacterial, and toxicity of propolis particles produced by stingless bee Heterotrigona itama found in brunei darussalam. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02476. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02476, PMID 31687571.

Sahlan M, Ardiellaputri AP, Hermasnyah H, Wijanarko A, Darwita RR. Anti oral biofilm mouthwash nanoemulsion containing extract propolis and curcumin. AIP Conf Proc. 2018;2024(1):1-9. doi: 10.1063/1.5064345.

Sahlan M, Mandala K, Pratami K, Adawiyah R, Wijarnako A, Lischer K. Exploration of the antifungal potential of Indonesian propolis from Tetragonula biroi bee on candida sp. and cryptococcus neoformans. Evergreen. 2020;7(1):118-25. doi: 10.5109/2740968.

Semalty M, Semalty A, Kumar G. Formulation and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films of glipizide. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2008;70(1):43-8. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.40330, PMID 20390079.

Ritthidej GC, Phaechamud T, Koizumi T. Moist heat treatment on physicochemical change of chitosan salt films. Int J Pharm. 2002;232(1-2):11-22. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00894-8, PMID 11790486.

Auda SH, El-Badry M, Ibrahim MA. Design, formulation and characterization of fast dissolving films containing dextromethorphan. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures (DJNB). 2014;9(1):133-41.

Hudzicki J. Kirby-bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. American Society for Microbiology. 2009;15:55-63.

Gosden PE, Andrews JM, Bowker KE, Holt HA, MacGowan AP, Reeves DS. Comparison of the modified stokes’ method of susceptibility testing with results obtained using MIC methods and British society of antimicrobial chemotherapy breakpoints. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;42(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.2.161, PMID 9738833.

Asawahame C, Sutjarittangtham K, Eitssayeam S, Tragoolpua Y, Sirithunyalug B, Sirithunyalug J. Antibacterial activity and inhibition of adherence of Streptococcus mutans by propolis electrospun fibers. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2015;16(1):182-91. doi: 10.1208/s12249-014-0209-5, PMID 25245331.

Bpom RI. Peraturan bpom nomor 32 tahun 2019 persyaratan keamanan dan mutu obat tradisional, Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan; 2019.

Khan AB, Mahamana R, Pal E. Review on mucoadhesive drug delivery system: novel approaches in modern era. Rguhs J Pharm Sci. 2014 Oct;4(4):128-41. doi: 10.5530/rjps.2014.4.2.

Govindasamy P, Kesavan BR, Narasimha JK. Formulation of unidirectional release buccal patches of carbamazepine and study of permeation through porcine buccal mucosa. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(12):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60192-6, PMID 24093793.

Mampho C, Pandey S, Ramontja J, Fosso Kankeu E, Waanders F. Synthesis and characterization of superabsorbent hydrogels based on natural polymers: kappa carrageenan. In: International conference on advances in science, engineering, technology and natural resources (ICASETNR-16). Vol. 11; 2016. p. 24-5.

Hashemi M, Ramezani V, Seyedabadi M, Ranjbar AM, Jafari H, Honarvar M. Formulation and optimization of oral mucoadhesive patches of myrtus communis by box behnken design. Adv Pharm Bull. 2017;7(3):441-50. doi: 10.15171/apb.2017.053, PMID 29071227.

Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Design and characterization of chitosan-containing mucoadhesive buccal patches of propranolol hydrochloride. Acta Pharm. 2007;57(1):61-72. doi: 10.2478/v10007-007-0005-9, PMID 19839407.

Nafee NA, Boraie MA, Ismail FA, Mortada LM. Design and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal patches containing cetylpyridinium chloride. Acta Pharm (Zagreb Croatia). 2003;53(3):199-212. PMID 14769243.

Bülichen D, Plank J. Water retention capacity and working mechanism of methyl hydroxypropyl cellulose (MHPC) in gypsum plaster-which impact has sulfate? Cem Concr Res. 2013;46:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.01.014.

Supranoto SC, Slot DE, Addy M, Van der Weijden GA. The effect of chlorhexidine dentifrice or gel versus chlorhexidine mouthwash on plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and tooth discoloration: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015;13(2):83-92. doi: 10.1111/idh.12078, PMID 25059640.

Krampe R, Visser JC, Frijlink HW, Breitkreutz J, Woerdenbag HJ, Preis M. Oromucosal film preparations: points to consider for patient centricity and manufacturing processes. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(4):493-506. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2016.1118048, PMID 26559519.

Osterbeg M, Claesson PM. Interactions between cellulose surfaces: effect of solution pH. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(5):603-18. doi: 10.1163/156856100742771.

Compilato DO, Carroccio AN, Calvino FR, Di Fede G, Campisi G. Haematological deficiencies in patients with recurrent aphthosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(6):667-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03482.x, PMID 19888941.

Edgar NR, Saleh D, Miller RA. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;10(3):26-36. PMID 28360966.

Mittal S, Nautiyal U. A review: herbal remedies used for the treatment of mouth ulcer. Mouth. 2019;8:9-14.

Samad R, Akbar FH, Nursyamsi N, Awing M. Propolis trigona sp. mouthwash efectiveness in lowering anaerobic gram-negative bacteria colonies. In: Health Science International Conference (HSIC 2017); 2017. p. 181-7. doi: 10.2991/hsic-17.2017.29.

Bowen WH, Koo HJ. Biology of streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms. Caries Res. 2011;45(1):69-86. doi: 10.1159/000324598, PMID 21346355.

Boddupalli BM, Mohammed ZN, Nath RA, Banji D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010;1(4):381-7. doi: 10.4103/0110-5558.76436, PMID 22247877.

Bruschi ML, de Freitas O. Oral bioadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2005;31(3):293-310. doi: 10.1081/ddc-52073, PMID 15830725.

Kharenko EA, Larionova NI, Demina NB. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems (Review). Pharm Chem J. 2009;43(4):200-8. doi: 10.1007/s11094-009-0271-6.