SUSTAINABLE MODIFICATION OF NATURAL STARCHES FOR ADVANCED POLYMERIC APPLICATIONS: GREEN SYNTHESIS STRATEGIES AND CASE INSIGHTS FROM ELEPHANT FOOT YAM STARCH

Authors

  • DINESH L. BAWANKAR Department of Pharmaceutics, Datta Meghe college of Pharmacy, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research DMIHER (DU) Sawangi, Meghe Wardha-442001, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8071-1968
  • UJWAL B. VYAS Department of Pharmaceutics, Datta Meghe college of Pharmacy, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research DMIHER (DU) Sawangi, Meghe Wardha-442001, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5655-927X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i4.58078

Keywords:

Starch, Green synthesis, Hydrogel, Sustainable elephant foot yam starch, Biodegradable film, Green solvents, Starch nanocrystal, Green polymeric materials

Abstract

The environmental concerns associated with conventional plastics have driven demand for sustainable polymeric materials. Starch, as a renewable and biodegradable biopolymer, offers an attractive alternative; however, its widespread application is limited by low mechanical strength, moisture sensitivity, and retrogradation. This review summarizes recent advances in green synthesis and modification methods for natural starches to produce advanced polymeric materials. Environmentally friendly approaches are highlighted, including physical (heat–moisture treatment, ultrasonication, irradiation), enzymatic, and green chemical modifications using non-toxic reagents, ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, and energy-efficient techniques (microwave assistance). The effects of these modifications on starch structure and functionality are discussed, along with applications in biodegradable films, hydrogels, nanocomposites, and drug delivery systems. Particular attention is given to Elephant Foot Yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) starch—an underexplored but promising raw material with unique physicochemical properties for bioplastics and pharmaceuticals. As a low-glycemic-index, resistant starch source, EFY starch (especially when physically or chemically modified) offers enhanced thermal and rheological properties, as well as sustainability advantages over other starches. Direct comparative cost and performance data against corn and potato starch remain limited, necessitating further application trials. Hydrothermally modified EFY starch produces highly elastic and thermostable gels with superior structural stability under high shear, making it suitable for demanding applications such as processing and thickening. Overall, this review presents sustainable pathways for starch modification to create next-generation green polymeric materials.

References

1. Temesgen S, Rennert M, Tesfaye T, et al. Review on spinning of biopolymer fibers from starch. Polymers.2021; 13:1121. doi:10.3390/polym13071121

2. Avérous L, Halley PJ. Biocomposites based on plasticized starch. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref.2009; 3:329–343. doi:10.1002/bbb.135

3. Tester RF, Karkalas J, Qi X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci.2004; 39:151–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2003.12.001

4. Yadav S, Mehra R, Guiné RPF, et al. Recent advances in starch-based nanocomposites: Processing, properties, and applications. EurPolym J. 2023; 190:112002. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112002

5. Liu H, Xie F, Yu L, et al. Thermoplastic starches: Properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci.2009; 34:1348–1368. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.07.001

6. Uwah TO, et al. Preliminary investigations into the physicochemical and compaction characteristics of modified starch of Discorea alata using diclofenac sodium tablet. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2018;10(7):66-74. doi:10.22159/ijpps.2018v10i7.23730

7. Bertoft E. Understanding starch structure: Recent progress. Agronomy.2017; 7:56. doi:10.3390/agronomy7030056

8. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 7th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2012.

9. Narkhede Sachin, B., et al. "Isolation and evaluation of starch of Artocarpus heterophyllus as a tablet binder." Int J PharmTech Res 3 (2011): 836-840.

10. Sjöö M, Nilsson L, editors. Starch in food: Structure, function and applications. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2024.

11. Xie F, Halley PJ, Avérous L. Rheology of starch-based systems. Prog Polym Sci.2012; 37:595–623. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.002

12. Kuraray Plastics. Thermoplastic starch (TPS): A green biodegradable plastic. Kuraray Co. Ltd., Japan; 2024.

13. Mali S, Grossmann MVE, Yamashita F. Biodegradable films from starch. Food Chem.2000; 71:453–458. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00236-8

14. Fan Y, Picchioni F. Modification of starch: Application of green solvents and controlled functionalization. Carbohydr Polym.2020; 241:116350. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116350

15. Shogren RL. Biodegradable mulches from starch. J Environ Polym Degrad.1999; 7:1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1022837412578

16. Perez S, Baldwin PM, Gallant DJ. Structural features of starch granules. Plant Physiol.2000; 122:1363–1373. doi:10.1104/pp.122.4.1363

17. Jane J. Structure of starch granules. J Appl Glycosci.2006; 53:85–92. doi:10.5458/jag.53.85

18. Singh N, Kaur L. Morphological, thermal, and rheological properties of starches. Food Chem.2003; 81:219–231. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00416-8

19. BeMiller JN, Whistler RL. Starch: Chemistry and Technology. 3rd ed. Academic Press; 2009.

20. Ellis RP, et al. Starch production and industrial use. J Sci Food Agric.1998; 77:289–311. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199806)77:3<289: AID-JSFA20>3.0.CO;2-P

21. Wang S, Copeland L. Effect of acid hydrolysis on starch structure. Carbohydr Polym.2012; 87:152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.045

22. Elballa W, Salih M. Influence of partially and fully pregelatinized starch on the physical and sustained-release properties of HPMC-based ketoprofen oral matrices. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2022;14(8):29-34.

23. Tester RF, Morrison WR. Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches. Cereal Chem.1990; 67:551–557.

24. FAO. Roots, Tubers, and Bananas in Human Nutrition. Rome: FAO; 1990.

25. Singh J, Dartois A, Kaur L. Starch digestibility. Food Chem.2009; 114:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.062

26. Sukhija S, Singh S, Riar CS. Effect of oxidation and crosslinking on elephant foot yam starch. Food Hydrocoll.2016; 55:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.11.020

27. Donovan JW. Phase transitions of starch-water systems. Biopolymers.1979; 18:263–275. doi:10.1002/bip. 1979.360180110

28. Liu Q. Understanding starch gelatinization. J Food Sci. 2005;70: R1–R9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621. 2005.tb07106.x

29. Singh N, et al. Thermal properties of tuber starches. Carbohydr Polym.2003; 54:293–300. doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00153-4

30. Reddy N, Yang Y. Bioplastics from starch. Prog Polym Sci.2013; 38:1653–1689. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.006

31. Wang S, et al. Effect of crosslinking on starch properties. Carbohydr Polym.2011; 85:376–383. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.02.038

32. Lawton JW. Effect of starch modification on biodegradability. Ind Crops Prod.1996; 5:77–83. doi:10.1016/0926-6690(95)00051-7

33. Liu H, et al. Retrogradation behavior of starch. Carbohydr Polym.2005; 61:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.021

34. Xie F, et al. Processing of starch-based materials. EurPolym J.2008; 44:300–312. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.11.015

35. Van Soest JJG, et al. Mechanical properties of starch plastics. J Appl Polym Sci.1997; 64:631–644. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970425)64:4<631: AID-APP4>3.0.CO;2-X

36. Shah U, et al. Structural modification strategies for native starch. Int J Biol Macromol.2022; 198:215–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.070

37. Rowe RC, et al. Pharmaceutical starch derivatives. Int J Pharm.2008; 349:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.07.039

38. Ashogbon AO, Akintayo ET. Recent trends in starch modification. Starch/Stärke.2014; 66:41–57. doi:10.1002/star.201300145

39. Singh S, et al. Thermal and rheological properties of elephant foot yam starch. Carbohydr Polym.2020; 245:116563. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116563

40. Whistler RL, Paschall EF. Starch Chemistry. Academic Press; 1965.

41. Karim AA, Norziah MH, Seow CC. Methods for starch modification. Food Chem. 2000; 71:9–36. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00120-X

42. Zobel HF. Molecules to granules: A comprehensive starch review. Starch/Stärke. 1988; 40:44–50. doi:10.1002/star.19880400202

43. Buléon A, et al. Starch granule structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol. 1998; 23:85–112. doi:10.1016/S0141-8130(98)00040-3

44. Copeland L, et al. Form and functionality of starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2009; 23:1527–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.09.016

45. Thakur VK, et al. green technology assisted starch nanohydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2016; 151:559–567. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.003

46. Mendes JF, et al. Development of starch-based materials. Molecules. 2021; 26:6880. doi:10.3390/molecules26226880

47. Soni PL, Sharma H. SEM studies of elephant foot yam starch. Starch/Stärke. 2003; 55:435–439. doi:10.1002/star.200390088

48. Liu P, et al. Sustainable starch processing. Green Chem. 2020; 22:1150–1166. doi:10.1039/C9GC03830A

49. Fan Y, Picchioni F. Green solvents for starch modification. Carbohydr Polym. 2020; 241:116350. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116350

50. Mathew S, et al. Green starch-based materials. Mater Today Sustain. 2020; 8:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2020.100036

51. Singh J, et al. Resistant starch formation. Food Chem. 2007; 104:435–442. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.059

52. Tang X, Alavi S. Recent advances in starch modification. Carbohydr Polym. 2011; 85:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.02.012

53. Rindlav-Westling Å, et al. Structure–property relations of starch films. Carbohydr Polym. 1998; 36:217–224. doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00041-0.

54. Lang S, Sui C, Wang L. Recent development in ozone-based starch modification: from generation methods to film applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;309(Pt 2):142780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142780.

55. Hoogstad TM, Timmer SM, van Boxtel AJB, Buwalda PL, Bitter JH, Kiewidt L. Environmental impact evaluation for heterogeneously catalysed starch oxidation. ChemRxiv. 2022;11(10): e202200029.

56. Broekman JOP, Genuino HCG, Heeres HJ, et al. Benign catalytic oxidation of potato starch using a homogeneous binuclear manganese catalyst and hydrogen peroxide. Catal Sci Technol. 2023; 13:1233–1243.

57. Guo T, Xie F, Chen L. Oxidation-induced starch molecular degradation: a comprehensive kinetic investigation using NaClO/NaBr/TEMPO system. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024; 277:134283.

58. Sukhija S, et al. Dual modification of elephant foot yam starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2016; 55:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.11.020

59. Tester RF, Qi X, Karkalas J. Hydrothermal modification of starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2001; 45:45–54. doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00239-3

60. Dai Y, et al. Deep eutectic solvents for starch treatment. Green Chem. 2013; 15:2499–2505. doi:10.1039/C3GC40698E

61. Zhang Q, et al. DES-based starch materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2022; 10:2112–2123. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06845

62. Van der Burgt Y, et al. Enzymatic starch modification. Biotechnol Adv. 2018; 36:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.09.002

63. Abbott AP, et al. Role of deep eutectic solvents in polymer processing. Chem Commun. 2003; 39:70–71. doi:10.1039/B210714G

64. Cerbu C, et al. Graft copolymerization of starch. Polymers. 2019; 11:765. doi:10.3390/polym11050765

65. Matyjaszewski K. ATRP in polysaccharides. Prog Polym Sci. 2009; 34:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.11.004

66. Chiefari J, et al. RAFT polymerization. Macromolecules. 1998; 31:5559–5562. doi:10.1021/ma9804951

67. Tokiwa Y, et al. PLA grafting onto starch. Macromol Biosci. 2009; 9:539–548. doi:10.1002/mabi.200800266

68. Lim LT, et al. Biodegradable starch–PLA blends. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006; 101:422–431. doi:10.1002/app.23215

69. Sheldon RA. Green chemistry and catalysis. Green Chem. 2005; 7:267–278. doi:10.1039/B418069K

70. Clark JH. Green chemistry: Today and tomorrow. Green Chem. 2006; 8:17–21. doi:10.1039/B517961E

71. Rai M, et al. Nanoparticles as catalysts. Biotechnol Adv. 2009; 27:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002

72. Iravani S. Green synthesis of nanoparticles. Green Chem. 2011; 13:2638–2650. doi:10.1039/C1GC15386B

73. Picchioni F, et al. Green modification of starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2016; 151:1156–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.043

74. Siracusa V, et al. Reinforced starch-based materials. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2009; 20:304–316. doi: 10.1016 /j.tifs.2009.04.002

75. Avérous L, Pollet E. Biodegradable Polymers. Springer; 2012.

76. Mohanty AK, et al. Natural Fibers and Biopolymers. CRC Press; 2005.

77. Tharanathan RN. Biodegradable films and composites. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2003; 14:71–78. doi:10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00280-7

78. Rhim JW, et al. Starch-based nanocomposites. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 22:1–10. doi:10.1007/s10068-013-0001-3

79. Savadekar NR, Mhaske ST. Renewable resources for bioplastics. PolymDegrad Stab. 2012; 97:2344–2351. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.08.010

80. Gross RA, Kalra B. Biodegradable polymers. Science. 2002; 297:803–807. doi:10.1126/science.297.5582.803

81. Singh A, et al. Reactive extrusion of starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2018; 195:575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.016

82. Sukhija S, et al. Oxidized–crosslinked elephant foot yam starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2016; 55:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.11.020

83. Avérous L. Biodegradable starch-based plastics. Macromol Symp. 2003; 198:19–29. doi:10.1002/masy.200350703

84. Liew CW, et al. Pharmaceutical starch excipients. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019; 45:130–143. doi:10.1080/03639045.2018.1533147

85. John MJ, Thomas S. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym. 2008; 71:343–364. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040

86. Kuraray Co. Ltd. Thermoplastic starch technical brochure. Japan, 2024.

87. European Bioplastics. Bioplastics market data. Europe, 2023.

88. Sudesh K, Iwata T. Sustainability of bioplastics. Clean. 2008; 36:433–442. doi:10.1002/clen. 200700183

89. Van der Burgt Y, et al. Acetylated starch plastics. Ind Crops Prod. 2013; 42:306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.006

90. Chen L, et al. Hydrophobic starch derivatives. Carbohydr Polym. 2013; 92:2056–2063. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.091

91. Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in starch composites. Mater Today. 2013; 16:220–227. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004

92. Joseph S, et al. Elephant foot yam starch-based bionanocomposite film. J Clean Prod. 2025; 412:137522. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137522

93. Kumar P, et al. Intelligent elephant foot yam starch films. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2021; 30:100733. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100733

94. Kumar R, et al. Elephant foot yam starch edible films. J Food Process Eng. 2020;43: e13345. doi:10.1111/jfpe.13345

95. Zhang Y, et al. Biodegradable starch nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym. 2013; 98:129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.064

96. Patel M, et al. Starch in pharmaceutical formulations. Pharm Dev Technol. 2020; 25:1–12. doi:10.1080/10837450.2019.1703736

97. Thoorens G, et al. Starch excipients in tablets. Int J Pharm. 2014; 473:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.055

98. Siracusa V, et al. Starch-blended biodegradable polymers. Mater Today Sustain. 2024; 6:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100065

99. Rudrapal, Mithun, ed. Polyphenols: Food, nutraceutical, and nanotherapeutic applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2023.

100. Liew CV, et al. Modified starches for drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2017; 530:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.028

101. Li J, et al. Starch-based hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2018; 181:223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.089

102. Zhang H, et al. Smart starch materials. Adv Funct Mater. 2019; 29:1808725. doi:10.1002/adfm.201808725

103. Grossman RF, et al. Biopolymer sustainability. Green Chem. 2019; 21:596–610. doi:10.1039/C8GC02835E

104. Wikipedia. Amorphophallus paeoniifolius. Accessed 2025.

105. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Elephant foot yam cultivation guide. TNAU, India.

106. Singh D, et al. Evaluation of the Gajendra variety of elephant foot yam. Indian J Agric Sci. 2016; 86:123–128.

107. Nair RR, et al. Elephant foot yam agronomy and yield. J Root Crops. 2017; 43:45–52.

108. Sahu PK, et al. Transformation efficiency of elephant foot yam. Plant Cell Rep. 2021; 40:123–135. doi:10.1007/s00299-020-02641-9

109. ICAR. Elephant Foot Yam Production Technology. New Delhi: ICAR, 2020.

110. Bendale, Atul R., et al. "Sonochemical Synthesis of 2, 3-diphenylquinoxaline using different catalysts, a green chemistry approach." Asian J. Research Chem 4.6 (2011): 887-889.

111. Sheldon RA. Green chemistry and sustainability. Chem Soc Rev. 2012; 41:1437–1451. doi:10.1039/C1CS15219J

112. Sukhija S, Riar CS. Functional properties of elephant foot yam starch. Starch/Stärke. 2016; 68:1–10. doi:10.1002/star.201500268

113. Singh S, et al. Oxidative modification of elephant foot yam starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2020; 242:116399. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116399

114. Ashogbon AO, Akintayo ET. Recent trends in starch modification. Starch/Stärke. 2014; 66:41–57. doi:10.1002/star.201300145

115. Nagar M, Sharanagat VS, Kumar Y, Singh L. Development and characterization of elephant foot yam starch-hydrocolloids based edible packaging film: physical, optical, thermal and barrier properties. J Food Sci Technol. 2020 Apr;57(4):1331-1341. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04167-w.

116. American Chemical Society. Twelve principles of green chemistry. Washington DC: ACS.

117. Bendale, A. R., et al. "Novel green approaches for synthesis of quinoxaline derivatives." Pelagia Research Library, Der ChemicaSinica 2.2 (2011): 20-24.

118. Clark JH. Green Chemistry Principles and Global Drivers. RSC Publishing; 2018.

119. European Commission. Life cycle assessment of biopolymers. EU Report; 2021.

120. Picchioni F. Sustainable starch functionalization. Carbohydr Polym. 2022; 275:118708. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118708

121. Zhang Y, et al. Sustainable modification of starch color via dual cold plasma. Food Chem. 2025; 441:139782. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139782

122. Sheldon RA. Green chemistry and sustainability. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(4):1437–1451. doi:10.1039/C1CS15219J (Foundational for TEA/LCA in green chemistry).

123. Anastas PT, Warner JC. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, 1998 (Classic reference for waste prevention and atom economy).

124. Joseph S., et al. Hydrophobicity and biodegradability of elephant foot yam starch films. Mater Chem Phys. 2024; 298:127384. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127384 (Specific to EFY sustainability).

125. FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023. Rome: FAO; 2023 (Supports the integration of agricultural waste into circular agrifood systems).

126. Bawankar DL, Vyas UB. Integrating green chemistry and quality by design: development of a novel starch-based microcomposite system for prolonged captopril delivery and flattened pharmacokinetics. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2026;19(4):213-222. doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2026v19i4.58187.

127. Ahmed Y, et al. Preparation and characterization of carboxymethyl millet starch and pregelatinized millet starch. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2025;18(6):99-102. doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i5.54627.

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

BAWANKAR, D. L., & VYAS, U. B. (2026). SUSTAINABLE MODIFICATION OF NATURAL STARCHES FOR ADVANCED POLYMERIC APPLICATIONS: GREEN SYNTHESIS STRATEGIES AND CASE INSIGHTS FROM ELEPHANT FOOT YAM STARCH. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i4.58078

Issue

Section

Review Article(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.