ANALYTICAL QUALITYBYDESIGN DRIVEN STABILITY INDICATING HPLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF VONOPRAZAN FUMARATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i4.58535Keywords:
Vonoprazan fumarate, AQbD, Stability-indicating method, HPLCAbstract
Objective: The present study aimed to develop and validate a simple, efficient, and robust analytical quality by design (AQbD) driven stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the quantification of vonoprazan fumarate(VPF) in its pharmaceutical dosage form.
Methods: An AQbD framework in conjunction with a Box-Behnken design was used to construct and optimize a stability-indicating HPLC technique. Retention time(RT) and tailing factor were used as response factors to evaluate method performance, whereas acetonitrile(ACN) concentration, flow rate, and column temperature were identified as essential method variables based on preliminary experiments. Forced degradation of VPF under International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) recommended stress settings verified specificity. The optimized approach was validated in accordance with ICH Q2 (R1).
Results: Using a mobile phase of acetonitrile: 0.1% glacial acetic acid (pH adjusted to 6.5), (80: 20% v/v), chromatographic separation was accomplished on a Shimadzu C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5.0 µm) column. A photodiode array (PDA) detector was used to measure the separation at 230 nm. The method's capacity to indicate stability was demonstrated through forced deterioration trials. Under circumstances of oxidative, basic, and acidic stress, VPF degraded, but it remained resistant to photolytic and thermal degradation. Precision (%RSD<2), accuracy (98.34-98.83 %), robustness (%RSD < 1.1 for column temperature and wavelength), and sensitivity with low detection and quantitation limit values were all demonstrated during method validation.
Conclusion: Implementation of AQbD driven systematic and risk-based approach into the development of a stability-indicating HPLC method for VPF enhanced method robustness, specificity and life cycle control.
References
1. Shehryar M, Ahmad RU, Kareem HK, Khan L, Ashraf MF, Hassan A, Saeed S, Tareen HK, Nazir DA, Ashraf MA. Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan vs Proton Pump Inhibitors in reflux disorders and H. pylori eradication: A literature review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 22;82:104760. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104760. PMID: 36268393; PMCID: PMC9577871.
2. Marabotto E, Ziola S, Savarino V, Giannini EG, Furnari M, Bodini G, Zingone F, Ghisa M, Barberio B, Zentilin P, Savarino E. vonoprazan fumarate for the Treatment of Gastric Ulcers: A Short Review on Emerging Data. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 15;13:99-104. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S228352. PMID: 32346304; PMCID: PMC7169470.
3. Otake K, Sakurai Y, Nishida H, Fukui H, Tagawa Y, Yamasaki H, Karashima M, Otsuka K, Inatomi N. Characteristics of the Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker vonoprazan fumarate (TAK-438). Adv Ther. 2016 Jul;33(7):1140-57. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0345-2. Epub 2016 Jun 10. PMID: 27287852.
4. Sugano K. vonoprazan fumarate, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: safety and clinical evidence to date. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 9;11:1756283X17745776. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17745776. PMID: 29383028; PMCID: PMC5784563.
5. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH guideline Q1A(R2): stability testing of new drug substances and products. Geneva: ICH; 2003.
6. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q9. Quality risk management. Geneva: ICH; 2005
7. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q8. Pharmaceutical Validation. Geneva: ICH;2009
8. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q14. Analytical procedure development. Geneva: ICH; 2003.
9. Ganorkar AV, Gupta KR. Analytical Quality by Design: A Mini Review. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2017 Nov;1(6):1555-1559. doi:10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000484.
10. Prajapati PB, Bagul N, Kalyankar G. Implementation of DoE and Risk-Based Enhanced Analytical Quality by Design Approach to Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Stability Study of Bosutinib. J AOAC Int. 2021 Dec 11;104(6):1742-1753. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsab078. PMID: 34100929.
11. Luo Z, Liu A, Liu Y, Wang G, Chen X, Wang H, Li M, Zhang H, Qiu Y, Zhai H. Development of a stability- indicating HPLC method for simultaneous determination of ten related substances in vonoprazan fumarate drug substance. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018 Feb 5;149:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 4. PMID: 29112902.
12. Alzaghal NM, El-Mossalamy ESH, El-Sayed GO. Method development and validation for estimation of vonoprazan by RP-HPLC method in bulk and tablets dosage form. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry. 2023 Aug. doi: 10.21608/ejchem.2023.193129.7593.
13. Saleh AM. UV Spectrophotometric Method Development and validation of vonoprazan fumarate in Bulk and pharmaceutical Dosage form; Green Profile Evaluation Via eco-scale and GAPI tools. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry. 2022 Aug. doi: 10.21608/ejchem.2022.161704.6948
14. Anusha K, Sowjanya G. A reliable RP-UPLC-TUV method for simultaneous estimation of clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and vonoprazan in co-packed pharmaceutical dosage forms: method development and validation with stability indicating properties. Int J Appl Pharm. 2024;16(2):351–357. doi:10.22159/ijap.2024v16i2.50059
15. Moneim MMA, Hamdy MMA. Chromatographic assay of recently approved co-formulation of vonoprazan fumarate with low dose Aspirin: AGREE, Complex MoGAPI, and RGB 12-model assessments. BMC Chemistry. 2024 Nov 16; 18.doi: 10.1186/s13065-024-01344-7
16. Abdelazim AH, Abdel-Fattah A, Osman AOE, Abdel-Kareem RF, Ramzy S. Spectrophotometric Quantitative Analysis of Aspirin and Vonoprazan fumarate in Recently Approved Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets Using Ratio Spectra Manipulating Tools. J AOAC Int. 2023 Mar 1;106(2):490-495. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsac128. PMID: 36264114.
17. Matta A, Sundararajan R. Green Analytical Stability Indicating UHPLC Method for the Quantification of Related Impurities in vonoprazan Formulation Applying Analytical Quality by Design. Separation Science Plus. 2025 Apr; 8. doi: 10.1002/sscp.70032.
18. International Council for Harmonisation. ICH guideline Q2(R1): validation of analytical procedures. Geneva: ICH; 2003
19. Ravisankar P, Navya C, Pravallika D, Sri DN. A review on step-by-step analytical method validation. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy. 2015 Oct. 5(10), 7-19.
20. Ferreira SL, Bruns RE, da Silva EG, Dos Santos WN, Quintella CM, David JM, de Andrade JB, Breitkreitz MC, Jardim IC, Neto BB. Statistical designs and response surface techniques for the optimization of chromatographic systems. J Chromatogr A. 2007 Jul 27;1158(1-2):2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.051. Epub 2007 Mar 18. PMID: 17416377.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 NIKHIL PATIL, SHITAL PATEL, MINAL SALUNKHE, VIVEK SHRIVASTAVA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.