ANTHROPOMETRIC STUDY OF LEFT EXTERNAL EAR: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN MEDICAL STUDENTS OF UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

SHRIVASTAVA BHAVANA; ACHARYA SUNITA; BHARAMBE VAISHALY KISHORE; MEDATWAL BHUPESH

doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i4.5052

Authors

SHRIVASTAVA BHAVANA Department of Anatomy, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Sai Tirupati University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
ACHARYA SUNITA Department of Anatomy, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Sai Tirupati University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
BHARAMBE VAISHALY KISHORE Department of Anatomy, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Sai Tirupati University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
MEDATWAL BHUPESH Department of Anatomy, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Sai Tirupati University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i4.5052

Keywords:

Auricle, Ear lobule, Ear index, Lobule index, Vernier caliper, Anthropometry

Abstract

Objective: The human ears are specific to an individual because the auricle is also a distinctive feature of a person like other identification features so it is used in various areas of science like forensic medicine, anthropology, and biology. The ear lobule is the last part of the auricle to develop.

Methods: This study was carried out among 100 students (50 Male and 50 Female) with age range from 18 to 25 years. The study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Results: Total ear length and ear width were significantly higher in male than female (p value<0.0001) in this study. Lobule length and lobule width of left ear were compared by independent t-test, it was found nonsignificant (p value 0.5706) and significantly higher in male than female (p 0.0017) respectively. The mean value of lobule index of left ear was found significant with higher value in male while the mean value of ear index of left ear was found nonsignificant.

Conclusion: Results according to genders who participated in the study where all dimensions (total ear length, ear width, lobule width and lobule index) were higher in male as compared to the female subjects. Although there was no significant difference observed in lobule length and ear index of left ear of male and female subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brucker MJ, Patel J, Sullivan PK, Department of Plastic Surgery, Brown Medical School and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence. A morphometric study of the external ear: age and sex-related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Aug 1;112(2):647-53. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000070979.20679.1F, PMID 12900628.

Deopa D, Thakkar HK, Prakash C, Niranjan R, Barua MP. Anthropometric measurements of external ear of medical students in Uttarakhand Region. J Anat Soc India. 2013 Jun 1;62(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2778(13)80018-4.

Britto J, Panchal P, Prasad A, Kumari R, Kumari S. Photogrammetric morphometric analysis of auricle. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):440-3. doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1130207032018.

Keith A. The significance of certain features and types of the External Ear. Nature. 1901;65(1671):16-21. doi: 10.1038/065016a0.

Akpa AO, Ibiam AA, Ugwu C. Anthropometrical study of the pinna among southeast Nigerians. J Exp Res. 2013;1:47-50.

Iannerelli A. Ear identification, forensic identification series. Fremont, CA: Paramount Publishing; 1989.

Krishan K, Kanchan T. Identification: prints-ear. Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. In: Identification: prints-ear, CINII Research; 2016. p. 74-80.

Meijerman l. Inter and intra-individual variation in ear prints. Leiden University; 2006 Feb 15.

Standring S, Ellis H, Healy J, Johnson D, Williams A, Collins P. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. AJNR Am J Neurorad. 2005 Nov;26(10):2703.

McKinney P, Giese S, Placik O. Management of the ear in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Oct 1;92(5):858-66. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199392050-00012, PMID 8415967.

Sharma A, Sidhu NK, Sharma MK, Kapoor K, Singh B. Morphometric study of ear lobule in northwest Indian male subjects. Anat Sci Int. 2007 Jun;82(2):98-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00166.x, PMID 17585565.

Shireen S, Karadkhelkar VP. Anthropometric measurements of human external ear. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015 Jul 23;4(59):10333-8. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2015/1489.

Verma P, Sandhu HK, Verma KG, Goyal S, Sudan M, Ladgotra A. Morphological variations and biometrics of ear: an aid to personal identification. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC138-42. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18265.7876, PMID 27437349:ZC138.

Rani D, Krishan K, Sahani R, Baryah N, Kanchan T. Variability in human external ear anthropometry-anthropological and forensic applications. Clin Ter. 2021;172(6):531-41. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2374, PMID 34821348.

Prasad RJ, Shakya A, Acharya A, Neupane GP. Anthropometric study of the external ear: a comparative study. Medphoenix. 2022 Aug 19;7(1):36-41. doi: 10.3126/medphoenix.v7i1.43195.

Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Apr 1;103(4):327-37. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70013-E, PMID 8480698.