CASE SERIES: CHALLENGES AND OUTCOMES OF TLIF PROCEDURES IN A PERIPHERAL HOSPITAL IN BHARATPUR, RAJASTHAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i6.5089Keywords:
TLIF, Chronic back pain, Spinal surgery, Rural healthcare, Patient outcomes, Surgical efficacyAbstract
Objective: Chronic back pain, particularly from degenerative spinal conditions, significantly impacts patient quality of life, especially in regions with limited healthcare resources, such as rural Rajasthan. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) has been recognized for its efficacy in treating severe spinal degeneration and instability. This case series examines the application of TLIF in a peripheral hospital setting, assessing its challenges and outcomes in such environments.
Methods: This study included three patients aged 34 to 75, who underwent TLIF at a peripheral hospital in Bharatpur, Rajasthan, from February to July 2024. Detailed preoperative and postoperative evaluations were conducted, focusing on pain levels and functional mobility. Follow-ups were performed at the first, second, and fourth weeks post-surgery to monitor recovery and assess surgical success.
Results: All patients reported significant improvements in pain and mobility by the first-month follow-up. The 34 y old female experienced complete pain relief and returned to full activities by four weeks. The 75 y old female and 65 y old male also showed considerable improvements in pain and function, with no severe complications noted during or after surgery.
Conclusion: TLIF can be effectively implemented in peripheral hospital settings with outcomes comparable to those in higher-resource environments. This case series demonstrates the feasibility and significant benefits of advanced spinal surgeries in resource-limited settings, highlighting the potential for expanding such sophisticated interventions to improve healthcare accessibility and patient outcomes in rural areas.
Downloads
References
Ichikawa N, Kumagai G, Wada K, Kudo H, Tanaka S, Asari T. Coagulation vascular morphology and vasculogenesis in spinal ligament ossification model mice. Spine. 2021;46(15):E802-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003891, PMID 33337674.
Daniels AH, Riew KD, Yoo JU. Lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management of the aging spine. Manual of Orthopaedics. 2020;7(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.moospo.2020.07.009.
Hollenbeck JF, Fattor JA, Patel V, Burger E, Rullkoetter PJ, Cain CM. Validation of pre-operative templating for total disc replacement surgery. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(1):84-91. doi: 10.14444/6011, PMID 30805290.
KO S, Kwon J, Lee Y, Chae S, Choi W. Comparison of pain-reducing effect after selective nerve root block according to the type of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(2):E60-4. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000723, PMID 30273185.
Choi KC, Shim HK, Kim JS, Cha KH, Lee DC, Kim ER. Cost effectiveness of microdiscectomy versus endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine J. 2019;19(7):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.003, PMID 30742976.
Greenberg MS. Handbook of neurosurgery. Thieme; 2021.
Pierce KE, Passias PG, Alas H, Brown AE, Bortz CA, Lafage R. Does patient frailty status influence recovery following spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity? Spine. 2020;45(7):E397-405. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003288.
Dutmer AL, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Soer R, Brouwer S, Bultmann U, Dijkstra PU. Personal and societal impact of low back pain: the groningen spine cohort. Spine. 2019;44(24):E1443-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003174, PMID 31369481.
Taylor H, McGregor A, Medeiros R, Richards R. Professionalism and ethics in the use of spinal fusion in peripheral hospitals. J Med Ethics. 2018;44(12):847-51. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104755.
Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence challenges and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6, PMID 29573872.
Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine. 2019;34(24):1863-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a95afb.
Sasso RC, Best NM, Mummaneni PV, Reilly TM, Hussain SM. Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine. 2005;30(6):670-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155423.18218.75, PMID 15770183.
Haffer H, Schomig F, Rickert M, Randau T, Raschke M, Wirtz D. Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on orthopaedic and trauma surgery in university hospitals in germany: results of a nationwide survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(14):e78. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00756, PMID 32675666.
Goh GS, Yue WM, Guo CM, Tan SB, Chen JL. Does the predominant pain location influence functional outcomes satisfaction and return to work after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy? Spine. 2021;46(10):E568-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003855, PMID 33290363.
Jain N, Phillips FM, Weaver T, Khan SN. Preoperative chronic opioid therapy: a risk factor for complications readmission continued opioid use and increased costs after one and two level posterior lumbar fusion. Spine. 2018;43(19):1331-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002609, PMID 29561298.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 PUNEET BANSAL, SHIFALI JOSHI, RAJ KUMAR INDOLIYA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.