INVESTIGATING FUTURE PHARMACISTS UNDERSTANDING OF VACCINES AND MYTHS SURROUNDING VACCINATION

SIDRAH ZAHID; HANA MORRISSEY; PATRICK BALL

doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i5.39778

Authors

SIDRAH ZAHID University of Wolverhampton, School of Pharmacy, United Kingdom
HANA MORRISSEY University of Wolverhampton, School of Pharmacy, United Kingdom
PATRICK BALL University of Wolverhampton, School of Pharmacy, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2020v12i5.39778

Keywords:

Vaccination, Measles, Mumps and rubella, Autism, Halal, Animal and blood free vaccines

Abstract

Objective: The United Kingdom has lost its measles, mumps and rubella free status due to a decline in vaccination uptake. There are several beliefs such as safety concern and media influence that discourage people from having vaccinations. To identify gaps in knowledge of vaccination within 3^rd year pharmacy students, and to observe whether they can spot myths about vaccines, in particular the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine.

Methods: A questionnaire-based approach was used after gaining ethical approval which included a range of open and closed questions.

Results: None of the participants could identify the six common myths reported by the World Health Organisation and 40% failed to accurately identify the type of vaccine of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. There were clear gaps in knowledge on vaccines in participants particularly from black, Asian and minority ethnic group participants compared to white students. Educating participants about the myths could have positive future implications on their scientific knowledge when they work as pharmacists.

Conclusion: Many students did not accurately identify the myths surrounding vaccines and were provided informative leaflets to enhance their scientific knowledge. The gaps in knowledge identified, demonstrates that further teaching sessions should be implemented to cover the grey areas, allowing them to appropriately recommend vaccinations in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Casiday R. Children's health and the social theory of risk: Insights from the British measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) controversy. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:1059-70.
2. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccines; 2013. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaccines/mmr-vaccine.html [Last accessed on 05 Mar 2020]
3. Chen R, DeStefano F. Negative association between MMR and autism. Lancet 1999;353;1987-8.
4. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini M, Pietrantonj C. Cochrane database of systematic reviews; 2012. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3/abstract [Last accessed on 09 Mar 2020]
5. Evans M, H Stoddart H, Condon L, Freeman E, Grizzell M, Mullen R. Parents’ perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study. Br J General Practice 2001;51:904-10.
6. Funk S. Critical immunity thresholds for measles elimination, London: Cmmid; 2017.
7. Gov UK. Measles in England; 2019. Available from: https://publichealthmatters.blog.gov.uk/2019/08/19/measles-in-england/ [Last accessed on 14 Mar 2020]
8. Harling H, White JM, Ramsay ME, Macsween KF, Van den Bosch C. The effectiveness of the mumps component of the MMR vaccine: a case control study. Vaccine 2005;23:4070-4.
9. Hilton S, Petticrew M, Hunt K. Parents' champions vs. vested interests: Who do parents believe about MMR? A qualitative study. BMC Public Health; 2007. p. 7.
10. Hilton S, Petticrew M, Hunt K. Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body’s immune system’: parental concerns about vaccine ‘overload’ and ‘immune-vulnerability’. Vaccine 2006;3:7.
11. National Health Services (NHS). Fall in coverage for all routine childhood vaccinations in England in 2018-19. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/news-and-events/latest-news/childhood-vaccination-coverage-statistics-2018-19 [Last accessed on 09 Mar 2020]
12. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Immunizations-childhood; 2020. Available from: https://cks.nice.org.uk/immunizations-childhood#!scenario:1 [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2020]
13. Plotkin S, Orenstein W, Offit P, Edwards K. Plotkin's vaccines. Infectious Disease 2017;7:50-62.
14. Practice Business. Inside the anti-vaxxer movement; 2019. Available from: https://practicebusiness.co.uk/inside-the-anti-vaxxer-movement/ [Last accessed on 13 Mar 2020]
15. Religious Tolerance. About the Jehovah's Witnesses Christian denomination; 2002. Available from: http://www.religioustolerance.org/witness6.htm [Last accessed on 11 Mar 2020]
16. Sathyanarayana Rao TS, Andrade C. The MMR vaccine and autism: sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud. Indian J Psychiatry 2011;53:95.
17. Schoenbohm R. How measles can change a life; 2019. Available from: https://www.vaccinestoday.eu/stories/how-measles-can-change-a-life/ [Last accessed on 04 Mar 2020]
18. Stewart M. Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine (MM Rvax Pro, Priorix); 2020. Available from: https://patient.info/medicine/measles-mumps-and-rubella-mmr-vaccine-mmrvaxpro-priorix [Last accessed on 05 Mar 2020]
19. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, Linnell J, Casson DM, Malik M, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998;351:637-41.
20. World Health Organisation (WHO). Six common misconceptions about immunization; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/detection/immunization_misconceptions/en/ [Last accessed on 14 Mar 2020]
21. Yung CF, Andrews N, Bukasa A, Brown KE, Ramsay M. Mumps complications and effects of mumps vaccination, England and Wales, 2002-2006. Emergency Infectious Disease 2011;4:661-7.