ORAL MUCOSAL ULCER INDUCTION METHODS IN RATS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2023.v15s2.01Keywords:
Induction methods, Oral mucosal ulcers, In vivo study, RatAbstract
Oral mucosal ulcers are a prevalent condition, but there are still limited drugs available to treat them. Varieties of induction techniques to obtain oral mucosal ulcer models in rats have frequently been used. This systematic review aimed to describe different approaches and to recommend the most effective method for oral mucosal ulcer induction methods in rats for anti-oral mucosal ulcer drug discovery. The PRISMA guidelines were used in the framework regarding this systematic review. The electronic databases PubMed, Science Direct, SCOPUS, and EBSCOhost-CINAHL Plus were used for article searching using specific keywords. The Risk of Bias Tool from Syrcle was used to undertake the evaluation of bias risk. Based on the analysis of 14 articles, the following findings were gathered: Wistar rats were frequently used mouse strains at an average of 8 w old and weighed between 120 and 300 g. Induction methods used to obtain ulcer models were acetic acid, biopsy punch, scalpel blade, thermal, and phenol. Acetic acid induction was the most commonly used compared to the other induction techniques. The ulcers were obtained by acetic acid identical to those that occur on the human oral mucosa and available at a reasonable price. However, the ulcer formation takes longer compared with biopsy punch and scalpel blade induction. The systematic review found that there are various methods for inducing oral ulcers in rats, with acetic acid being the recommended method to produce a suitable mucosal ulcer model in rats.
Downloads
References
Fitzpatrick SG, Cohen DM, Clark AN. Ulcerated lesions of the oral mucosa: clinical and histologic review. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s12105-018-0981-8, PMID 30701449.
Bruce AJ, Dabade TS, Burkemper NM. Diagnosing oral ulcers. JAAPA. 2015;28(2):1-10. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000459826.63026.67, PMID 25621959.
Zakiawati D, Nur’aeny N, Setiadhi R. Distribution of oral ulceration cases in oral medicine integrated installation of Universitas Padjadjaran dental hospital. Padjadjaran J Dent. 2020;32(3):237-42. doi: 10.24198/pjd.vol32no3.23664.
Glick M, Greenberg MS, Lockhart PB, Challacombe SJ. Burket’s oral medicine. 13th ed. WILEY-Blackwell; 2021. p. 36.
Sivapathasundharam B, Sundararaman P, Kannan SK. Oral ulcers-a review. J Dent Oral Disord. 2018;4(4):1098.
Mortazavi H, Safi Y, Baharvand M, Rahmani S. Diagnostic features of common oral ulcerative lesions: an updated decision tree. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:7278925. doi: 10.1155/2016/7278925, PMID 27781066.
Vandamme TF. Use of rodents as models of human diseases. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014;6(1):2-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.124301, PMID 24459397.
Herrmann K, Pistollato F, Stephens ML. Beyond the 3rs: expanding the use of human-relevant replacement methods in biomedical research. ALTEX. 2019;36(3):343-52. doi: 10.14573/altex.1907031, PMID 31329258.
Sengupta P. The laboratory rat: relating its age with human’s. Int J Prev Med. 2013 Jun;4(6):624-30. PMID 23930179.
Beiranvand M. A review of the most common in vivo models of stomach ulcers and natural and synthetic anti-ulcer compounds: a comparative systematic study. Phytomed Plus. 2022;2(2):100264. doi: 10.1016/j.phyplu.2022.100264.
Adinortey MB, Ansah C, Galyuon I, Nyarko A. In vivo models used for evaluation of potential antigastroduodenal ulcer agents. Ulcers. 2013;2013:796405.
Beiranvand M. A review of the most common in vivo models of stomach ulcers and natural and synthetic anti-ulcer compounds: a comparative systematic study. Phytomed Plus. 2022;2(2):100264. doi: 10.1016/j.phyplu.2022.100264.
Page MJ, Mckenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD. The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71, PMID 33782057.
Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, De Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. Syrcle’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43, PMID 24667063.
Bergonzi MC, Vuletic M, Jakovljevic V, Zivanovic S, Papic M, Papic M. The evaluation of healing properties of galium verum-based oral gel in aphthous stomatitis in rats 2022. Molecules. 2022;27(15):4680.
Gao Q, Shang Y, Zhou W, Deng S, Peng C. Marine collagen peptides: A novel biomaterial for the healing of oral mucosal ulcers. Dent Mater J. 2022;41(6):850-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-323, PMID 35934799.
Khounganian R, Auda S, Al-Zaqzouq R, Al-Zaqzouq R, Al-Semari H, Shakeel F. Effect of two different delivery systems of honey on the healing of oral ulcer in an animal model. J Food Sci Technol. 2020;57(11):4211-9. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04459-6, PMID 33071342.
Arundina I, Diyatri I, Surboyo MDC, Monica E, Afanda NM. Growth factor stimulation for the healing of traumatic ulcers with liquid rice hull smoke. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021;16(3):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.01.003, PMID 34140871.
Wicaksono S, Nugraha AP, Rahmahani J, Rantam FA, Kuncorojakti S, Susilowati H. Adipose mesenchymal stem cell metabolites oral gel enhance pro-angiogenic factors expression, angiogenesis, and clinical outcome of oral ulcer rat model. Eur J Dent. 2023. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761192, PMID 36963426.
Chen P, Yao H, Yuan Q, Li P, Wang X, Su W. Discovery of the possible mechanisms in kouyanqing granule for treatment of oral ulcers based on network pharmacology n.d. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20(1):258.
Liu N, Guan S, Wang H, Li C, Cheng J, Yu H. The antimicrobial peptide nal-p-113 exerts a reparative effect by promoting cell proliferation, migration, and cell cycle progression. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:7349351. doi: 10.1155/2018/7349351, PMID 30298136.
Oliveira BV, Barros Silva PG, Nojosa JS, Brizeno LA, Ferreira JM, Sousa FB. TNF-alpha expression, evaluation of collagen, and TUNEL of Matricaria recutita L. extract and triamcinolone on oral ulcer in diabetic rats. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(3):278-90. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150481, PMID 27383710.
Li J, Wen Z, Lou Y, Chen J, Gao L, Li X. Soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor promotes the healing of oral ulcers. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023;78:100208. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100208, PMID 37148830.
Ayuningtyas NF, Hendarti HT, Soebadi B, Condro Surboyo MD, Hadi P, Ganesha R. Expression of VEGF and CD-31 in traumatic ulcer of diabetic Wistar rats after application of Citrus limon peel essential oil. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13(3):380-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.03.009, PMID 37025967.
Rofiqi Sulkhan AAR, Mun’im A, Sutriyo S. Effect of glycyrrhizin and sappan wood extract on chemically-induced oral mucosal ulcer: an in vivo animal study. Pharmacogn J. 2021;13(4):909-15. doi: 10.5530/pj.2021.13.117.
Lee J, Shin D, Roh JL. Treatment of intractable oral ulceration with an oral mucosa equivalent. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):1779-85. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34270, PMID 30419151.
Nodai T, Hitomi S, Ono K, Masaki C, Harano N, Morii A. Endothelin-1 elicits TRP-mediated pain in an acid-induced oral ulcer model. J Dent Res. 2018;97(8):901-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034518762381, PMID 29518348.
Arundina I, Diyatri I, Budhy TI, Jit FY. The effect of brotowali stem extract (Tinospora crispa) towards an increasing number of lymphocytes in the healing process of traumatic ulcer on diabetic Wistar rat. J Int Dent Med Res. 2017;10(3):975-80.
Cavalcante GM, Sousa de Paula RJ, Souza LP, Sousa FB, Mota MR, Alves AP. Experimental model of traumatic ulcer in the cheek mucosa of rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2011;26(3):227-34. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502011000300012, PMID 21537526.
Indonesia BPOM. Peraturan badan pengawas obat dan makanan nomor 10 tahun 2022 tentang pedoman uji toksisitas praklinik secara in vivo. Jakarta: Biro hukum dan Organisasi; 2022. Available from: https://jdih.pom.go.id/ download/product/1379/10/2022. [Last accessed on 02 Sep 2023].
Garber JC, Barbee RW, Blielitzki JT, Clayton LA, Donovan JC, Kohn DF. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed. Washington, (DC): National Academies Press. US; 2011. p. 41-5.
Idrus E, Hartanti PD, Suniarti DF, Prasetyo SR, Wimardhani YS, Subarnbhesaj A. An experimental model of chemically induced ulceration of the buccal mucosa of Mus musculus. Makara J Health Res. 2019;23(3):181-7. doi: 10.7454/msk.v23i3.1158.
Idrus E, Pramatama IAM, Suniarti DF, Wimardhani Y, Yuniastuti M. Experimental model of thermally induced-tongue ulcer in mice. J Int Dent Med Res. 2019;12:929-34.
Wahyuni IS, Sufiawati I, Nittayananta W, Levita J. Anti-inflammatory activity and wound healing effect of Kaempferia galanga l. Rhizome on the chemical-induced oral mucosal ulcer in Wistar rats. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:2281-94. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S359042, PMID 35422649.
Nair AB, Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016;7(2):27-31. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.177703, PMID 27057123.
Wuri R, Rosdianto AM, Goenawan H. Utilization of rats as blunt trauma animals model: a literature review. Indones Med Veterinus. 2021;10(2):338-54. doi: 10.19087/ imv.2021.10.2.338.
Osborne N, Avey MT, Anestidou L, Ritskes‐Hoitinga M, Griffin G. Improving animal research reporting standards: HARRP, the first step of a unified approach by ICLAS to improve animal research reporting standards worldwide. EMBO Rep. 2018;19(5):e46069. doi: 10.15252/embr.201846069, PMID 29669797.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 ERIS NURUL RAHMADHINI, INDAH SUASANI WAHYUNI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
