A STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF ADDITIONAL BACKWARD WALKING TRAINING ON BALANCE AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE

SHUBHAM KALYANA; DEEPAK LOHAR; JAFAR KHAN; LAKSHITA SINGH RAO

doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3043

Authors

SHUBHAM KALYANA Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
DEEPAK LOHAR Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
JAFAR KHAN Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
LAKSHITA SINGH RAO Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3043

Keywords:

Stroke, Conventional therapy, Backward walking training

Abstract

Objective: Stroke is a significant cause of mortality and disability globally, with a higher prevalence in urban areas of India compared to rural regions. Men in India face a greater risk of stroke, attributed to factors such as smoking and drinking, which are more prevalent among Indian men. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of backward walking training on balance and functional outcomes in stroke patients.

Methods: Experimental Group received 30 min of backward walking training three times per week for three weeks. Balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and functional outcomes were measured using the Barthel Index (BI) before and after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using Student's paired t-test and unpaired t-test.

Results: Before the intervention, there were no significant differences between the Control Group and Experimental Group in terms of BBS and BI scores. However, after the intervention, the Experimental Group showed a significant improvement in both balance (BBS) and functional outcomes (BI) compared to the Control Group. The Experimental Group demonstrated a greater improvement in BI scores (9.94%) compared to the Control Group (4.95%), and a similar pattern was observed for BBS scores, with the Experimental Group showing a greater improvement (7.87%) compared to the Control Group (3.49%). These differences were statistically significant (p<0.01), indicating that the intervention in the Experimental Group was more effective than the Control Group.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that incorporating backward walking training into stroke rehabilitation programs can be beneficial for patients in terms of enhancing their balance and functional abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Stroke. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail.

World Heart Federation. Stroke. 2021. Available from: https://www.world-heart-federation.org/resources/stroke.

Dewar RN, Donnelly CJ, Walsh DM. The importance of proximal trunk control for balance recovery following stroke: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2020;80:273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.021.

Hu MH, Woollacott MH, Multon MB. The effect of stroke on anticipatory postural adjustments of the trunk during rapid arm movements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(10):969-78.

Faria CD, Teixeira Salmela LF, Nadeau S. Effects of the direction of turning on the timed up and go test with stroke subjects. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(3):196-206. doi: 10.1310/tsr1603-196. PMID 19632964.

Weerdesteyn V, de Niet M, van Duijnhoven HJ, Geurts AC. Falls in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(8):1195-213. PMID 19235120.

Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E. Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):165-70. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.28030, PMID 11833018.

De Oliveira CB, de Medeiros IRT, Frota NAF, Greters ME, Conforto AB. Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: main tools for evaluation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(8):1215-26. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.12.0220, PMID 19235121.

Clark DJ, Condliffe EG, Patten C. Activation impairment alters muscle torque-velocity in the paretic leg of stroke survivors at matched maximal power outputs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(5):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.004.

Chen IH, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Chan RC, Wang RY. Locomotor training effects on walking speed and biological correlates in individuals with chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012;36(1):13-20. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318246d84b.

Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404-11. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.

Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(4):415-21. doi: 10.1191/026921501678310216, PMID 11518442.

Ng SS, Hui Chan CW. The timed up and go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011, PMID 16084820.