EFFECTIVENESS OF SUPPLEMENTED BACKWARD WALKING TRAINING ALONG WITH CONVENTIONAL THERAPY ON BALANCE AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE

Authors

  • SHUBHAM KALYANA Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
  • DEEPAK LOHAR Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
  • JAFAR KHAN Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
  • LAKSHITA SINGH RAO Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3044

Keywords:

Stroke, Rehabilitation, Backward walking training, Balance

Abstract

Objective: A stroke is a significant cause of mortality and disability worldwide, including in India, where it ranks as the second leading cause of death and the third most common cause of disability. Impairments in motor functions, such as balance and walking, are common consequences of stroke and have a substantial impact on functional abilities. Various rehabilitation strategies have been employed, but the effectiveness of these approaches varies.

Methods: The study included 40 individuals with a history of stroke who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. The control group received conventional therapy, while the experimental group received supplemented backward walking training along with conventional therapy. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Barthel Index (BI), and balance was evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Pre-and post-test scores were collected for both groups.

Results: The results showed that the experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher improvement in BI scores (9.94%) compared to the control group (4.95%), indicating that the supplemented backward walking training had a greater impact on enhancing activities of daily living. In terms of balance, both groups showed improvements in BBS scores, with the control group exhibiting a 3.49% change and the experimental group showing a larger improvement of 7.87%. These improvements were statistically highly significant.

Conclusion: Supplemented backward walking training, when combined with conventional therapy, has a positive impact on balance and functional outcomes in stroke patients. The results emphasize the potential of incorporating backward walking training into stroke rehabilitation programs to enhance recovery and improve the quality of life for stroke survivors. However, the study has limitations, including a relatively small sample size and short intervention duration, necessitating further research with larger sample sizes and longer intervention periods to validate the effectiveness of supplemented backward walking training in stroke rehabilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(5):e259-81. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5, PMID 25104492.

Pandian JD, Sudhan P. Stroke epidemiology and stroke care services in India. J Stroke. 2013;15(3):128-34. doi: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.128, PMID 24396806.

Thigpen MT, Light KE, Creel GL, Flynn SM. The effects of backward walking training on balance and mobility in an individual with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a case report. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012;36(3):116-22. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31825d0074.

Batchelor FA, Mackintosh SF, Said CM, Hill KD. Falls after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(6):482-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00796.x. PMID 22494388.

Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, Jeng JS, Hung C. How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009;40(1):163-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523621, PMID 18948606.

Lofgren B, Nyberg L, Mattsson E. Three-year follow-up of fear of falling and falls in 61-year-old women with and without stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:568654. doi: 10.1155/2012/568654.

Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Wood Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Richards CL, Cote R. A task-orientated intervention enhances walking distance and speed in the first year post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(5):509-19. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr763oa, PMID 15293485.

Choi YI, Kim BR, Nam KY, Lee JH, Kim JS. The effects of backward walking training on balance and gait ability in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):1090-9. doi: 10.1177/0269215516679780.

Ahmed W, Alwe R, Wade D. One-year functional outcomes following major trauma: experience of a UK level 1 major trauma centre. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(12):1646-52. doi: 10.1177/0269215517712044. PMID 28580790.

Cho KH, Kim MK, Lee HJ, Lee WH. Virtual reality training with cognitive load improves walking function in chronic stroke patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;236(4):273-80. doi: 10.1620/tjem.236.273. PMID 26228205.

Cho KH, Lee WH. Virtual walking training program using a real-world video recording for patients with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(5):371-80. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31828cd5d3, PMID 23598900.

Lee DK, Kang MH, Yoon SR. Effects of backward walking training on walking balance and functional recovery in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(5):465-74. doi: 10.1177/0269215515590968.

Published

15-07-2023

How to Cite

KALYANA, S., D. LOHAR, J. KHAN, and L. S. RAO. “EFFECTIVENESS OF SUPPLEMENTED BACKWARD WALKING TRAINING ALONG WITH CONVENTIONAL THERAPY ON BALANCE AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 15, no. 4, July 2023, pp. 108-10, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3044.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>