COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF EARLY INTERVENTION AND LATE INTERVENTION FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

ANKIT SANKHLA; DEEPAK LOHAR; JAFAR KHAN; ABHISHEK ARORA

doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3045

Authors

ANKIT SANKHLA Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
DEEPAK LOHAR Neurology and Psychosomatic Disorders, Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
JAFAR KHAN Neurology and Psychosomatic Disorders, Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India
ABHISHEK ARORA Neurology and Psychosomatic Disorders, Pacific College of Physiotherapy, Udaipur-313001, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2023v15i4.3045

Keywords:

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Early intervention, Late intervention, Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by challenges in social interaction, communication, and repetitive behaviors. Early intervention is widely recognized as crucial for improving outcomes in individuals with ASD. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal timing of intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of early intervention and late intervention for individuals with ASD. The study aimed to synthesize existing evidence and provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of these two intervention approaches in improving outcomes for children and adults with ASD.

Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. The search terms included keywords related to ASD, early intervention, late intervention, children, adults, and outcome measures. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on randomized controlled trials and comparative studies with adequate sample sizes. The selected studies underwent rigorous quality assessment and data extraction. Meta-analysis was conducted using statistical software to determine the overall efficacy of early intervention and late intervention in improving outcomes related to social interaction, communication, adaptive functioning, and other relevant domains.

Results: The distribution of cases according to expressive language and motor skills was analyzed in two groups: Group A (early intervention) and Group B (late intervention). The results showed no statistically significant differences in the distribution of cases according to expressive language and motor skills between the two groups. The findings suggested that the timing of intervention may not strongly influence the distribution of these skills in individuals with ASD.

Conclusion: This study found no significant differences in the distribution of cases according to expressive language and motor skills between early and late intervention groups. These findings are consistent with previous research, indicating that the distribution of these skills may not be strongly influenced by the timing of intervention. However, further research with larger samples and standardized assessment methods is needed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the relationships between intervention timing and the distribution of these skills in individuals with ASD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rogers SJ, Vismara LA. Evidence-based, comprehensive treatments for early autism. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008;37(1):8-38. doi: 10.1080/15374410701817808.

Dawson G, Rogers S, Munson J, Smith M, Winter J, Greenson J. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics. 2010;125(1):e17-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0958, PMID 19948568.

Oono IP, Honey EJ, McConachie H. Parent-mediated early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD009774. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009774.pub2. PMID 23633377.

Stahmer AC, Schreibman L, Cunningham AB. Toward a technology of treatment individualization for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res. 2011;1380:229-39. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.043, PMID 20858466.

Warren Z, Veenstra Vander Weele J, Stone W. Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorders. Comparative effectiveness review no. 26. AHRQ publication No. 11-EHC029-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.

Maglione MA, Gans D, Das L, Timbie J, Kasari C, Technical Expert Panel. Nonmedical interventions for children with ASD: recommended guidelines and further research needs. Pediatrics. 2012;130Suppl 2:S169-78. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0900O, PMID 23118248.

Smith LE, Maenner MJ, Seltzer MM. Developmental trajectories in adolescents and adults with autism: the case of daily living skills. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(6):622-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.03.001. PMID 22632621.

Fournier KA, Hass CJ, Naik SK, Lodha N, Cauraugh JH. Motor coordination in autism spectrum disorders: a synthesis and meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(10):1227-40. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0981-3, PMID 20195737.

Anderson DK, Liang JW, Lord C. Predicting young adult outcome among more and less cognitively able individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55(5):485-94. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12178, PMID 24313878.

Billstedt E, Gillberg IC, Gillberg C. Autism after adolescence: population-based 13- to 22-year follow-up study of 120 individuals with autism diagnosed in childhood. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005;35(3):351-60. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-3302-5, PMID 16119476.

Ozonoff S, Young GS, Landa RJ, Brian J, Bryson S, Charman T. Diagnostic stability in young children at risk for autism spectrum disorder: a baby siblings research consortium study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56(9):988-98. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12421. PMID 25921776.