RUTIN-LOADED ETHYLCELLULOSE-BASED NANOSPONGE FOR IN VITRO BREAST CANCER: FORMULATION AND OPTIMISATION BY 32 FACTORIAL DESIGN

Authors

  • SANNIDHI Nitte (Deemed to be University), NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Department of Pharmaceutics, Mangalore, India
  • SNEH PRIYA Nitte (Deemed to be University), NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Department of Pharmaceutics, Mangalore, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-8726
  • JAINEY P. JAMES Nitte (Deemed to be University), NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Mangalore, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0564-8506
  • MURARI UPADHYAY Father Muller College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutics, Mangalore, India https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6929-3469

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i4.57963

Keywords:

Rutin, Nanosponge, Factorial design, Antioxidant, Cytotoxicity

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study was to enhance the aqueous solubility and anticancer potential of rutin, a poorly water-soluble flavonoid, by formulating it into a nanosponge (NS) drug delivery system.

Methods: Rutin-loaded nanosponges (RNS) were prepared using the emulsification–solvent diffusion method with ethylcellulose (EC) as the polymer at a drug-to-polymer ratio of 1:20. A 3² factorial design was employed to optimise formulation variables, including polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) concentration and sonication time. Particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and entrapment efficiency (EE) were selected as dependent variables. The optimised rutin-loaded nanosponge (ORNS) formulation was further evaluated for in vitro drug dissolution, antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity studies.

Results: The ORNS exhibited a mean particle size of 163.4 nm, a PDI of 0.368, and a significant improvement in drug release, with in vitro dissolution of 86.16 ± 0.79% compared to 38.39 ± 0.75% for pure rutin, indicating enhanced solubility. The nanosponge formulation also showed superior antioxidant activity and significantly enhanced cytotoxicity, exhibiting a 1.73-fold increase in cell death compared to pure rutin.

Conclusion: The developed rutin-loaded nanosponge significantly enhanced solubility, antioxidant activity, and in vitro cytotoxic efficacy, indicating its promise as a delivery system for breast cancer therapy; however, further in vivo studies are warranted to confirm its therapeutic efficacy and safety.

References

1. Palombo EA. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011(1):680354. doi:10.1093/ecam/nep067.

2. Mintah SO, Asafo-Agyei T, Archer MA, Junior PA, Boamah D, Kumadoh D, et al. Medicinal plants for the treatment of prevalent diseases. In: Pharmacognosy – Medicinal Plants. London: IntechOpen; 2019. p. 1-9. doi:10.5772/intechopen.82049.

3. Thakur M, Singh K, Khedkar R. Phytochemicals: extraction process, safety assessment, toxicological evaluations, and regulatory issues. In: Functional and Preservative Properties of Phytochemicals. Academic Press; 2020. p. 341-61. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818593-3.00011-7.

4. Mohammad AR, et al. Palbociclib response in Iraqi patients with metastatic breast cancer: clinical practice. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2026;19(2):235-42. doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2026v19i2.57670.

5. Hassanpour SH, Dehghani M. Review of cancer from a molecular perspective. J Cancer Res Pract. 2017;4(4):127-129. doi:10.1016/j.jcrpr.2017.07.001.

6. Shields M. Chemotherapeutics. In: Pharmacognosy. Academic Press; 2017. p. 295-313. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-802104-0.00014-7.

7. Kooti W, Servatyari K, Behzadifar M, Asadi-Samani M, Sadeghi F, Nouri B, et al. Effective medicinal plants in cancer treatment, part 2: a review study. J Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2017;22(4):982-995. doi:10.1177/2156587217696927.

8. Gezici S, Şekeroğlu N. Current perspectives in the application of medicinal plants against cancer: novel therapeutic agents. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19(1):101-11. doi:10.2174/1871520619666181224121004.

9. Hegazy H, Amin MM, Fayad W, Zakaria MY. TPGS surface-modified bilosomes as boosting cytotoxic oral delivery systems of curcumin against doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Int J Pharm. 2022;619:121717. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121717.

10. Mostafa MM, Amin MM, Zakaria MY, Hussein MA, Shamaa MM, Abd El-Halim SM. Chitosan surface-modified PLGA nanoparticles loaded with cranberry powder extract as a potential oral delivery platform for targeting colon cancer cells. Pharmaceutics.2023;15(2):606. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020606.

11. Amboli NA. Assessment of in vitro cytotoxic potential of ethanolic extract of leaves of Colocasia esculenta by BSL method. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2025;17(11):32-7. doi:10.22159/ijpps.2025v17i11.56131.

12. Deepika MS, Thangam R, Sheena TS, Sasirekha R, Sivasubramanian S, Babu MD, et al. A novel rutin-fucoidan complex-based phytotherapy for cervical cancer through enhanced bioavailability and cancer cell apoptosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:1181-95. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.178.

13. Reinholz J, Landfester K, Mailänder V. The challenges of oral drug delivery via nanocarriers. Drug Deliv. 2018;25(1):1694-1705. doi:10.1080/10717544.2018.1501119.

14. Singireddy A, Subramanian S. Cyclodextrin nanosponges to enhance the dissolution profile of quercetin by inclusion complex formation. Part Sci Technol. 2016;34(3):341-6. doi:10.1080/02726351.2015.1081658.

15. Khan KU, Minhas MU, Badshah SF, Suhail M, Ahmad A, Ijaz S. Overview of nanoparticulate strategies for solubility enhancement of poorly soluble drugs. Life Sci.2022;291:120301. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120301.

16. Vedaga SB, Gondkar SB, Saudagar RB. Nanosuspension: an emerging trend to improve solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9(3):549-53. doi:10.22270/jddt.v9i3.2635.

17. Bergal A, Elmas A, Akyüz G. A new and effective approach for anticancer drug delivery: nanosponges. Nano Res Appl. 2019;5(3):1-6. doi:10.36648/2471-9838.5.3.43.

18. Jawaharlal S, Subramanian S, Palanivel V, et al. Cyclodextrin-based nanosponges as promising carriers for active pharmaceutical ingredients. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2024;38(1):e23597.

19. Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, Coco R, Le Breton A, Préat V. PLGA-based nanoparticles: an overview of biomedical applications. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):505-22.

20. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel). 2011;3(3):1377-97.

21. Mehnert W, Mäder K. Solid lipid nanoparticles: production, characterisation and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(Suppl):83-101.

22. Shivani S, Poladi KK. Nanosponges: novel emerging drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;6(2):529-40. doi:10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(2).529-40.

23. Krishnamoorthy K, Rajappan M. Nanosponges: a novel class of drug delivery system. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;15(1):103-11. doi:10.18433/j3k308.

24. Pandey P, Purohit D, Dureja H. Nanosponges: a promising novel drug delivery system. Recent Pat Nanotechnol. 2018;12(3):180-91.doi:10.2174/1872210512666180925102842.

25. Prabhu PP, Gujaran TV, Mehta CH, Suresh A, Koteshwara KB, Pai KG, et al. Development of lapatinib nanosponges for enhancing bioavailability. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;65:102684. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102684.

26. Adeleke OA. Premium ethylcellulose polymer-based architectures at work in drug delivery. Int J Pharm X.2019;1:100023.

27. Tiwari K, Bhattacharya S. The ascension of nanosponges as a drug delivery carrier: preparation, characterisation and applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022;33(3):28. doi:10.1007/s10856-022-06652-0.

28. Poornima SP, Priya S. Gastroretentive floating tablets enclosing nanosponge-loaded lafutidine for gastric ulcer: formulation and evaluation. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2021;55(Suppl 1):S100-S111. doi:10.5530/ijper.55.1s.41.

29. Amer RI, El-Osaily GH, Gad SS. Design and optimisation of topical terbinafine hydrochloride nanosponges: application of full factorial design, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2020;11(1):13-20. doi:10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_85_19.

30. Pandya KD, Shah NV, Gohil DY, Seth AK, Aundhia CJ, Patel SS. Development of risedronate sodium-loaded nanosponges by experimental design: optimisation and in vitro characterisation. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2019;81(2):293-301. doi:10.36468/pharmaceutical-sciences.512.

31. Almutairy BK, Alshetaili A, Alali AS, Ahmed MM, Anwer MK, Aboudzadeh MA. Design of olmesartan medoxomil-loaded nanosponges for hypertension and lung cancer treatments. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(14):2272. doi:10.3390/polym13142272.

32. Abualhasan MN, Mansour J, Jaradat N, Zaid AN, Khadra I. Formulation and development of a validated UV-spectrophotometric analytical method of rutin tablet. ISRN Anal Chem. 2017;2017:2624947. doi:10.1155/2017/2624947.

33. Abbas N, Sarwar K, Irfan M, Hussain A, Mehmood R, Arshad MS, et al. Formulation and evaluation of indomethacin-loaded nanosponges for oral delivery. Acta Pol Pharm.2018;75(5):1201-13.

34. Moin A, Roohi NF, Rizvi SM, Ashraf SA, Siddiqui AJ, Patel M, et al. Design and formulation of polymeric nanosponge tablets with enhanced solubility for combination therapy. RSC Adv. 2020;10(57):34869-84. doi:10.1039/D0RA06611G.

35. Ahmed MM, Fatima F, Anwer MK, Ibnouf EO, Kalam MA, Alshamsan A, et al. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of a topical nanosponge-based gel containing butenafine for the treatment of fungal skin infection. Saudi Pharm J. 2021;29(5):467-77. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2021.04.010.

36. Ahmed MM, Fatima F, Alali A, Kalam MA, Alhazzani K, Bhatia S, et al. Ribociclib-loaded ethylcellulose-based nanosponges: formulation, physicochemical characterisation and cytotoxic potential against breast cancer. Adsorpt Sci Technol. 2022;2022:1922263. doi:10.1155/2022/1922263.

37. Ravi GS, Charyulu RN, Dubey A, Prabhu P, Hebbar S, Mathias AC. Nano-lipid complex of rutin: development, characterisation and in vivo investigation of hepatoprotective, antioxidant activity and bioavailability in rats. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(8):3631-49. doi:10.1208/s12249-018-1195-9.

38. Panhwar QK, Memon S. Synthesis, characterisation and antioxidant study of Cr(III)-rutin complex. Chem Pap. 2014;68:614-23. doi:10.2478/s11696-013-0494-6.

39. Nguyen HV, Nguyen NT, Tran HK, Huynh TT, Vo VH, Le CT, et al. Improved dissolution of poorly water-soluble rutin via solid dispersion prepared using a fluid-bed coating system.Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(12):1559. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17121559.

40. Kızılbey K. Optimization of rutin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles synthesised by single-emulsion solvent evaporation method. ACS Omega. 2019;4(1):555-62. doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b02767.

41. Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L, Chowdhury P. Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Pol Pharm. 2010;67(3):217-23.

42. Akar Z, Küçük M, Doğan H. A new colorimetric DPPH• scavenging activity method with no need for a spectrophotometer applied on synthetic and natural antioxidants and medicinal herbs. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2017;32(1):640-7. doi:10.1080/14756366.2017.1284068.

43. Mishra K, Ojha H, Chaudhury NK. Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay: a critical review and results. Food Chem. 2012;130(4):1036-43. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.127.

44. Caparica R, Júlio A, Araújo MEM, Baby AR, Fonte P, Costa JG, et al. Anticancer activity of rutin and its combination with ionic liquids on renal cells. Biomolecules. 2020;10(2):233. doi:10.3390/biom10020233.

45. Asfour MH, Mohsen AM. Formulation and evaluation of pH-sensitive rutin nanospheres against colon carcinoma using HCT-116 cell line. J Adv Res. 2018;9:17-26. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.10.003.

46. Kumar A, Rao R. Enhancing efficacy and safety of azelaic acid via encapsulation in cyclodextrin nanosponges: development, characterisation and evaluation. Polym Bull. 2021;78:5275-5302. doi:10.1007/s00289-020-03366-2.

47. Sharma K, Kadian V, Kumar A, Mahant S, Rao R. Evaluation of solubility, photostability and antioxidant activity of ellagic acid cyclodextrin nanosponges. J Food Sci Technol. 2022;59(3):898-908. doi:10.1007/s13197-021-05085-6.

48. Abbas MM, Rajab NA. Preparation and characterisation of etodolac as a topical nanosponges hydrogel. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2019;28(1):64-74. doi:10.31351/vol28iss1pp64-74.

49. Aldawsari HM, Badr-Eldin SM, Labib GS, El-Kamel AH. Design and formulation of a topical hydrogel integrating lemongrass-loaded nanosponges with enhanced antifungal effect: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:893-902. doi:10.2147/IJN.S74771.

50. Malla S, Neupane R, Boddu SH, Abou-Dahech MS, Pasternak M, Hussein N, et al. Application of nanocarriers for paclitaxel delivery and chemotherapy of cancer. In: Sezer AD, editor. Paclitaxel. London: Academic Press; 2022. p. 73-127. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-90951-8.00004-7.

51. Pandit J, Sultana Y, Aqil M. Chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles of bevacizumab for retinal targeting: optimisation, characterisation and in vitro toxicity evaluation. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(7):1397-1407. doi:10.1080/21691401.2016.1243545.

52. Rodrigues K, Nadaf S, Rarokar N, Gurav N, Jagtap P, Mali P, et al. QbD approach for the development of hesperetin-loaded colloidal nanosponges. OpenNano. 2022;7:100045. doi:10.1016/j.onano.2022.100045.

53. Sujitha YS, Muzib YI. Formulation and optimisation of quercetin-loaded nanosponge topical gel: ex vivo, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies. Int J Appl Pharm. 2019;11(5):156-65. doi:10.22159/ijap.2019v11i5.32850.

54. Takeuchi I, Kato Y, Makino K. Effects of polyvinyl alcohol on drug release from nanocomposite particles using poly(lactide-co-glycolide). J Oleo Sci.2021;70(3):341-8.

55. Geraili A, Xing M, Mequanint K. Design and fabrication of drug delivery systems toward adjustable release profiles for personalised treatment. VIEW. 2021;2(5):20200126. doi:10.1002/viw.20200126.

56. Pund AU, Shendge RS, Pote AK. Current approaches on gastroretentive drug delivery systems. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2020;10(1):139-46. doi:10.22270/jddt.v10i1.3803.

57. Fatima F, Anwer MK. Development and characterisation of ibrutinib-loaded ethylcellulose-based nanosponges: cytotoxicity assay against MCF-7 cell lines. Appl Sci. 2023;13(8):4984. doi:10.3390/app13084984.

58. Satari A, Ghasemi S, Habtemariam S, Asgharian S, Lorigooini Z. Rutin: a flavonoid as an effective sensitiser for anticancer therapy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:9913179. doi:10.1155/2021/9913179.

59. Gupta N, Singh S, Singh AT, Jaggi M. Pharmacological significance and toxicity overview of oleanolic acid isolated from Lantana camara roots. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2026 Feb 7 [cited 2026 Feb 8];19(2):15-24. Available from: https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ajpcr/article/view/57375.

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

SANNIDHI, PRIYA, S., JAMES, J. P., & UPADHYAY, M. (2026). RUTIN-LOADED ETHYLCELLULOSE-BASED NANOSPONGE FOR IN VITRO BREAST CANCER: FORMULATION AND OPTIMISATION BY 32 FACTORIAL DESIGN. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i4.57963

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.