TOXIC EFFECTS OF 2.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, 17% ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID, AND 2% CHLORHEXIDINE SOLUTIONS ON THE VIABILITY OF DENTAL PULP MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS

BUNGA CAHYA MUSTIKASARI; ANGGRAINI MARGONO; KAMIZAR NAZAR

doi:10.22159/ijap.2019.v11s1.162

TOXIC EFFECTS OF 2.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, 17% ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID, AND 2% CHLORHEXIDINE SOLUTIONS ON THE VIABILITY OF DENTAL PULP MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS

Authors

BUNGA CAHYA MUSTIKASARI Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
ANGGRAINI MARGONO Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
KAMIZAR NAZAR Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019.v11s1.162

Keywords:

Dental pulp mesenchymal stem cell, Sodium hypochlorite 25, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 17, Chlorhexidine 2, Cell viability

Abstract

Objective: Disinfection of the root canal system is a key factor in the success of regenerative endodontic treatment. However, dental irrigation
solutions must exert bactericidal effects while maintaining stem cell viability. This study aimed to compare the effects of solutions containing 2.5%
sodium hypochlorite, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine on the viability of dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells.
Methods: Primary cells were obtained from immature third molars and cultured. Subsequently, an immunofluorescence assay specific for the
mesenchymal stem cell marker STRO-1 was used to identify dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells in the cultures. These cells were exposed to the three
above-described solutions, after which cell viability was analyzed using an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay.
Results: The viabilities of dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells treated with the three irrigating solutions differed significantly from the viability of
control cells (P ≤ 0.05). However, no significant differences in cell viability were observed among the solutions (P ≥ 0.05).
Conclusion: All tested solutions had toxic effects on the viability of dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Haapsalo M, Qian W. Irrigants and intracanal medicaments. In:
Ingle JI, Backland LK, Baumgartner JC, editors. Ingle’s Endodontics 6.
Connecticut: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2008. p. 992-4.
2. Hargreaves KM, Law AS. Regenerative endodontic. In: Hargreaves KM,
Cohen S, editors. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis:
Mosby Elsevier; 2011. p. 602-3.
3. Rosa V, Della Bona A, Cavalcanti BN, Nör JE. Tissue engineering:
From research to dental clinics. Dent Mater 2012;28:341-8.
4. Bhat V, Prasad K, Bhat SS, Bhat A. Role of tissue engineering in
dentistry. J Indian Acad Dent Spec 2011;2:37-42.
5. Hargreaves KM, Diogenes A, Teixeira FB. Treatment options:
Biological basis of regenerative endodontic procedures. Pediatr Dent
2013;35:129-40.
6. Ruparel NB, Teixeira FB, Ferraz CC, Diogenes A. Direct effect of
intracanal medicaments on survival of stem cells of the apical papilla.
J Endod 2012;38:1372-5.
7. Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human
dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 2000;97:13625-30.
8. Trevino EG, Patwardhan AN, Henry MA, Perry G, Dybdal-
Hargreaves N, Hargreaves KM, et al. Effect of irrigants on the survival
of human stem cells of the apical papilla in a platelet-rich plasma
scaffold in human root tips. J Endod 2011;37:1109-15.
9. Jamal M, Chogle S, Goodis H, Karam SM. Dental stem cells and their
potential role in regenerative medicine. J Med Sci 2011;4:53-61.
10. d’Aquino R, De Rosa A, Laino G, Caruso F, Guida L, Rullo R, et al.
Human dental pulp stem cells: From biology to clinical applications.
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2009;312B:408-15.
11. Mishra N, Narang I, Mittal N. Platelet-rich fibrin-mediated revitalization
of immature necrotic tooth. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:412-5.
12. Nosrat A, Li KL, Vir K, Hicks ML, Fouad AF. Is pulp regeneration
necessary for root maturation? J Endod 2013;39:1291-5.
13. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive
ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. Int
Endod J 2007;40:415-26.
14. Alkahtani A, Al Khudhairi TD, Anil S. A comparative study of the
debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root
canal irrigation systems. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:12.
15. Saghiri MA, Delvarani A, Mehrvarzfar P, Nikoo M, Lotfi M,
Karamifar K, et al. The impact of pH on cytotoxic effects of three root
canal irrigants. Saudi Dent J 2011;23:149-52.
16. Galler KM, D’Souza RN, Federlin M, Cavender AC, Hartgerink JD,
Hecker S, et al. Dentin conditioning codetermines cell fate in
regenerative endodontics. J Endod 2011;37:1536-41.
17. Walton RE, Rivera EM. Cleaning and shaping. In: Walton RE,
Torabinejad M, editors. Principles and Practice of Endodontics. 3rd ed.
United States of America: W. B Saunders Company; 2002. p. 219.
18. Atari M, Barajas M, Hernández-Alfaro F, Gil C, Fabregat M, Ferrés
Padró E, et al. Isolation of pluripotent stem cells from human third
molar dental pulp. Histol Histopathol 2011;26:1057-70.
19. Pérez AL, Spears R, Gutmann JL, Opperman LA. Osteoblasts and MG-
63 osteosarcoma cells behave differently when in contact with proRoot
MTA and white MTA. Int Endod J 2003;36:564-70.
20. Estrela C, Alencar AH, Kitten GT, Vencio EF, Gava E. Mesenchymal
stem cells in the dental tissues: Perspectives for tissue regeneration.
Braz Dent J 2011;22:91-8.
21. Lovelace TW, Henry MA, Hargreaves KM, Diogenes A. Evaluation
of the delivery of mesenchymal stem cells into the root canal space
of necrotic immature teeth after clinical regenerative endodontic
procedure. J Endod 2011;37:133-8.
22. Premalatha BR, Rao RS, Mysorekar V. Immunofluorescence in oral
pathology: Part I-methodology. World J Dent 2011;2:326-30.
23. Longo JP, Valois CA, Tapajós ÉC, Santos FM, Azevedo RB.
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of endodontic irrigants on human cells.
Rev Clín Pesq Odontol 2010;6:135-40.
24. Alkahtani A, Alkahtany SM, Mahmood A, Elsafadi MA,
Aldahmash AM, Anil S, et al. Cytotoxicity of QMix™ endodontic
irrigating solution on human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.
BMC Oral Health 2014;14:27.
25. Amaral KF, Rogero MM, Fock RA, Borelli P, Gavini G. Cytotoxicity
analysis of EDTA and citric acid applied on murine resident
macrophages culture. Int Endod J 2007;40:338-43.
26. Lee TH, Hu CC, Lee SS, Chou MY, Chang YC. Cytotoxicity of
chlorhexidine on human osteoblastic cells is related to intracellular
glutathione levels. Int Endod J 2010;43:430-5.

View Abstract PDF Download PDF

Published

05-04-2019

How to Cite

MUSTIKASARI, B. C., MARGONO, A., & NAZAR, K. (2019). TOXIC EFFECTS OF 2.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, 17% ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID, AND 2% CHLORHEXIDINE SOLUTIONS ON THE VIABILITY OF DENTAL PULP MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 11(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2019.v11s1.162